Tag Archives: equity

Name: Jeremy Eveland
Brand: Attorney Jeremy Eveland
Rating: 4.9 (28 reviews)

Mergers and Acquisitions

Last Updated: June 11, 2026

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) are business strategies used by companies to grow their operations and increase their market share. M&A is a term used to describe the consolidation of two or more companies into one, usually involving the transfer of assets and ownership from one company to another. M&A can be done for a variety of reasons, such as expanding a company’s product line, entering new markets, or improving operational efficiency. M&A is also used to acquire assets or companies in order to increase the company’s valuation and market share.

In an M&A transaction, the acquiring company typically makes an offer to purchase the target company, which includes the purchase of the target’s assets, liabilities, and ownership. The target company can either accept the offer, or negotiate with the acquiring company. Once the offer is accepted, the companies enter into an agreement that outlines the details of the transaction, including the transfer of assets, liabilities, and ownership.

The M&A process involves several stages, including due diligence, negotiation, and transaction execution. During the due diligence stage, the companies involved analyze the financials of the target company to determine its value and viability. During the negotiation stage, the companies negotiate the terms of the deal and agree on a purchase price. Finally, the transaction is executed and the companies complete the transfer of assets and ownership.

M&A is a complex process that requires careful consideration and strategic planning. Companies considering an M&A transaction should ensure that they are prepared for the financial and legal implications of the transaction. Additionally, companies should consider the potential impact of the transaction on their current operations, employees, and customers.

Mergers and Acquisitions Attorney

You want a business lawyer to help you with Mergers and Acquisitions because the process of M&A is complex, and requires an understanding of the legal issues associated with it. For example, a successful M&A transaction requires the ability to evaluate the legal risks associated with the transaction, and ensure that the rights of both parties involved are protected. A business lawyer can provide legal advice to help you identify and manage these risks. In addition, a business lawyer can help you draft the contracts and documents associated with the M&A transaction.

It is important to ensure that the M&A transaction is legally binding and enforceable. Furthermore, a business lawyer can help you negotiate the terms of the M&A transaction, and provide advice on the best way to structure the deal. This is important to ensure that the best interests of all parties involved are taken into consideration. Finally, a business lawyer can help me to close the M&A transaction, and ensure that all legal requirements are met. This is important to ensure that the M&A transaction is completed in a timely and efficient manner. Overall, a business lawyer can provide invaluable assistance in ensuring that the M&A transaction is successful and beneficial to all parties involved.

Mergers and Acquisition Negotiations

When engaging in M&A negotiations, the parties must determine a mutually beneficial agreement that is beneficial to all stakeholders. This includes setting a fair purchase price and determining the terms of the deal. Depending on the size of the deal, the parties may need to consider legal and tax implications, as well as financial and operational issues. Other considerations may include the transfer of technology and intellectual property, and the impact of the M&A on employees and customers.

The negotiation process typically begins with an initial offer, followed by a period of negotiations and counter-offers. The parties must be willing to compromise and reach a consensus. During the process, the parties must be mindful of their respective interests and the interests of stakeholders, as well as any potential risks or liabilities that may arise. If the parties cannot agree to a deal, the process may be terminated and the parties will have to start the process anew.

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are negotiations between two or more companies or entities that aim to combine resources, assets, and operations. The purpose of such negotiations is to create a larger and more efficient entity, or to acquire an existing company to expand the scope of operations. M&As involve a variety of stakeholders including shareholders, directors, management, customers, suppliers, and creditors. They can be either friendly or hostile, with the latter being more challenging and rarer.

The success of the M&A negotiation process depends on the quality of the agreement reached by the parties. A successful M&A deal should be beneficial to all stakeholders, provide a clear path forward, and create long-term value for the parties involved.

Industries Heavily Involved in Mergers and Acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are a common business practice in many industries. In the financial services industry, M&A is used to gain access to new products, services, and markets. Banks and other financial institutions often merge to increase their size and gain access to larger loan portfolios, higher deposits, and a more diverse customer base. Technology companies often engage in M&A to acquire new technologies, access new markets, or increase their intellectual property portfolios. For example, Microsoft has made numerous acquisitions over the years, including LinkedIn, Skype, and GitHub.

In the consumer goods industry, M&A is used to gain access to new brands, products, or distribution channels. For example, a food company may acquire a rival brand to gain access to a new customer base or a distribution network. In the retail industry, M&A is used to increase market share, gain access to new technologies, and expand into new markets. For example, Amazon has made numerous acquisitions, including Whole Foods and Zappos, in order to expand its product offerings and increase its customer base.

The healthcare industry is also a major source of M&A activity. Companies often acquire competitors to gain access to new technologies, expand their product portfolios, and increase their customer base. Pharmaceutical companies often acquire other companies to gain access to new products or technologies. In addition, hospitals and other healthcare providers often merge in order to gain access to larger patient populations and more resources.

Finally, the energy industry is a major source of M&A activity. Companies often acquire competitors to gain access to new technologies, expand their product portfolios, and increase their market share. For example, oil and gas companies often acquire other companies to gain access to new sources of oil and gas. In addition, utilities often merge in order to gain access to larger customer bases and increase their efficiency.

Definition of Mergers and Acquisitions

Mergers and Acquisitions uses several areas of law including contract law, business law, succession law, intellectual property law and others. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is defined as the combination of two or more companies, either through a purchase of one company by another or a consolidation of the two companies. In the case of a purchase, one company (the acquirer) will purchase the assets, liabilities and equity of another company (the target). In the case of a consolidation, the two companies will combine their assets, liabilities, and equity into a single entity.

M&A is a complex process that involves a variety of legal, financial, and strategic considerations. On the legal front, M&A transactions must be structured in a manner that complies with applicable laws and regulations. Companies may also need to consider the financial implications of a potential transaction, such as the cost of financing the purchase or the tax implications of the transaction. From a strategic perspective, companies should consider the potential synergies that can be achieved through combining two companies, such as the ability to increase market share, reduce costs, gain access to new technologies, or achieve economies of scale.

The goal of M&A is to create value for the acquiring company by improving its competitive position or increasing its revenue or profits. The value created may come in the form of increased efficiency, greater market share, new products or services, or access to new markets or resources. Ultimately, a successful M&A transaction is one that creates long-term value for the acquiring company.

Types of Mergers and Acquisitions

M&A can take the form of a merger, acquisition, joint venture, or combination of these methods. A merger is when two companies combine and form a single new entity. An acquisition is when one company purchases another company, and the acquired company’s assets and liabilities become part of the acquiring company. A joint venture is when two companies form a new entity, where both companies share ownership.

The primary goal of M&A is to increase the value of the shareholder’s investments. Companies may pursue M&A strategies for a variety of reasons, such as increasing their market share, expanding into new markets, diversifying their product offerings, or achieving cost savings through sharing resources. M&A can also be used to eliminate competitors and gain access to new technology or expertise.

There are several types of M&A, including horizontal merger, vertical merger, conglomerate merger, and leveraged buyouts. In a horizontal merger, two companies in the same industry combine to form a larger company. A vertical merger occurs when two companies in different but related industries combine. A conglomerate merger involves the acquisition of multiple companies in unrelated industries. Finally, a leveraged buyout is the purchase of a company using borrowed money, with the intention to pay the debt off using the company’s future profits.

M&A can bring numerous benefits, such as increased market share, economies of scale, synergy, and diversification. However, M&A can also be risky, since the combination of two companies has the potential to create a variety of problems, such as cultural clashes, operational inefficiencies, and financial problems. Therefore, it is important to thoroughly research and analyze any potential M&A opportunities before proceeding.

Horizontal Mergers

A horizontal merger is a type of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transaction in which two companies in the same industry merge together. This is in contrast to a vertical merger, where two companies in different stages of production or distribution merge together. Horizontal mergers are typically viewed as more difficult to complete than vertical mergers, as they often create competitive issues.

Horizontal mergers can have a number of different objectives, such as reducing costs, increasing market share, or even entering a new geographic market. The primary benefit of a horizontal merger is that the two companies can combine their resources, allowing them to achieve efficiencies of scale and reduce costs. This could be an attractive option for companies in highly competitive industries, as it would allow them to remain competitive and increase their market share.

In addition to the potential cost savings, another common objective of horizontal mergers is to gain access to new technology and skills. By combining with a company in the same industry, a company can gain access to new technology, processes, and personnel that can help them become more competitive. For example, a company in the automotive industry may merge with a company that specializes in electric vehicles in order to gain access to the technology and know-how necessary to produce them.

Horizontal mergers can also lead to increased competition in an industry, as the larger company that is created may be able to increase its market share and drive competitors out of the market. This can lead to higher prices for consumers, so regulators often scrutinize these types of mergers very closely to ensure that they don’t lead to anti-competitive outcomes.

Overall, horizontal mergers can be an attractive option for companies in the same industry, as they can lead to cost savings, access to new technology and personnel, and increased market share. However, they must also be carefully evaluated to ensure that they don’t lead to anti-competitive outcomes.

Vertical Mergers

A vertical merger is a type of merger or acquisition that occurs between two companies operating at different stages of the same production process or supply chain. For example, a merger between a supplier and a customer, or between a manufacturer and a retailer. The primary rationale for a vertical merger is that it can allow the two companies to realize cost savings and efficiencies by cutting out the middleman, as well as streamlining the production process and improving distribution capabilities. Additionally, vertical mergers can result in increased power in negotiating prices with suppliers and customers, as well as increased control over the supply chain.

The antitrust authorities of the United States view vertical mergers more favorably than horizontal mergers, as vertical mergers do not reduce competition in the same way. The antitrust authorities will still review a vertical merger to ensure that it does not pose any risk of reducing competition, such as by creating a monopoly or creating barriers to entry for new competitors.

Vertical mergers can be complex and have a variety of legal ramifications. It is important for companies considering a vertical merger to consult with legal and financial advisors to ensure that the merger will be beneficial and will not run afoul of any antitrust regulations. The process of a vertical merger also involves due diligence, negotiation, and the completion of legal documents. Once the merger is completed, the two companies must integrate their operations and resources to realize the expected cost savings and efficiencies.

Conglomerate Mergers

A conglomerate merger is a type of merger and acquisition that combines two or more companies from different industries into one entity. A conglomerate merger is often used as a way to enter into new markets, diversify a company’s portfolio, or expand its reach. Conglomerate mergers are usually motivated by a company’s desire to build a competitive advantage and gain synergy through combining operations and resources. The parent company in a conglomerate merger typically seeks to leverage the strengths of each acquired company in order to create a competitive advantage and increase its profits.

When a conglomerate merger is successful, it can generate significant cost savings and improved efficiency. This is because the parent company can take advantage of economies of scale and reduce costs through the integration of different production processes. Additionally, the parent company can benefit from the acquired company’s expertise and existing customer base, allowing it to quickly gain market share and increase revenues.

However, conglomerate mergers can be complex and difficult to manage. This is because the parent company has to integrate the operations and resources of two or more companies from different industries, which is no small feat. Additionally, the parent company must be able to identify and capitalize on the synergies between the two companies, and create a culture of collaboration and integration.

Overall, conglomerate mergers are a way for companies to gain access to new markets, diversify their portfolios, and expand their reach. They can provide significant cost savings and improved efficiency, but the parent company must be prepared to manage the complexities and risks associated with the merger.

Consolidation Mergers

Consolidation mergers are an important part of mergers and acquisitions that involve combining multiple companies into one. This type of merger is used to increase the size and scope of the business and to create economies of scale that can help it become more competitive in the marketplace. The larger company is usually the one that initiates the merger, and it typically purchases the smaller companies in order to gain access to their assets and operations. The larger company may also take on the liabilities of the smaller companies, which can help reduce the costs associated with the merger.

In a consolidation merger, the larger company may absorb the smaller ones, or it may merge its operations with those of the other companies. In the latter case, the merged company will keep its existing management and leadership, and the two separate companies will combine their assets, liabilities, and operations. This type of merger may also involve restructuring the business, such as downsizing or changing the way the company is organized. In addition, the larger company may also acquire the rights to any intellectual property owned by the smaller companies.

Consolidation mergers can be beneficial for both the larger and smaller companies involved. For the larger company, it can help it become more competitive in the marketplace by combining the assets of multiple companies and creating economies of scale. The smaller companies may also benefit, as they can gain access to the larger company’s resources and financial strength. However, there are also risks associated with consolidation mergers, such as the potential for losing control of the merged company and the potential for the larger company to dominate the smaller ones.

Asset Acquisition

Asset acquisition is a form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) that involves the purchase of one company’s assets by another. This is different from a stock acquisition, where the acquiring company purchases the target company’s shares of stock. In an asset acquisition, the purchaser obtains all of the target company’s assets but none of its liabilities. It is not necessary for the target company to be a legal entity; it can also be an individual.

Asset acquisition is typically used when a company wants to acquire specific assets, such as intellectual property, physical assets, or certain contracts. It is also often used when a company wants to avoid certain liabilities that may be associated with the target company. It is also common in situations where the target company has valuable assets that may not be easily transferred to the acquiring company, such as real estate.

Asset acquisition is a complex process that requires careful consideration of various legal and financial issues. The process typically involves negotiating an asset purchase agreement between the parties, which outlines the terms of the transaction. Additionally, the buyer must determine the fair market value of the assets and liabilities in order to properly allocate the purchase price. Other considerations include tax implications, corporate governance, and regulatory considerations.

Overall, asset acquisition is a complex process that requires careful consideration of various legal and financial issues. It can be a beneficial way for companies to acquire specific assets, while avoiding certain liabilities associated with the target company. However, it is important to understand the risks and rewards associated with asset acquisition before entering into any such transaction.

Stock Acquisition

Stock acquisition is one of the key processes involved in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity. In its simplest form, a stock acquisition is the purchase of a majority stake in another firm’s stock by an existing firm. This occurs when the acquiring firm purchases a controlling interest in the target firm, usually by paying a premium to the current shareholders of the target company. The acquiring company then has the ability to influence the target company’s operations, management, and strategy.

Often, the acquiring company will pay a premium in order to acquire the target company’s shares as a way to gain control. This premium is usually determined by the market value of the target firm and can include a variety of factors such as the target firm’s performance, competitive landscape, and industry trends. The acquiring company may also seek to gain synergies from the acquisition by combining the target company’s assets and operations with those of the acquiring company.

Stock acquisition is an important part of the M&A process, as it allows the acquiring company to gain control of a target firm and potentially increase its value and profits. However, stock acquisition is also a complex and difficult process that requires careful consideration and analysis to ensure a successful outcome. The acquiring company must consider all of the potential risks involved in the transaction and analyze the target firm to determine if the acquisition will be beneficial and profitable. Proper research and due diligence are paramount when considering a stock acquisition and should be conducted prior to any agreements being finalized.

Divestiture

Divestiture is a type of merger and acquisition strategy that involves the sale of a company’s business unit, division, or subsidiary. It is a strategic decision to divest or sell off part of the company in order to focus on core operations and to raise capital for other investments. It is usually motivated by a company’s need to focus on its core operations, reduce costs, or raise capital.

Divestiture can take the form of a spin-off, joint venture, or divestment. Spin-offs involve the creation of a new company from a division or subsidiary of the existing company. A joint venture is a form of business partnership between two or more parties, in which the partners agree to combine resources and share the profits. With divestment, the company sells the division or subsidiary to another company.

The process of divestiture can be complex and can involve many legal and financial considerations. Companies must evaluate the potential tax implications, the impact on employee morale, and the potential for increased competition. Companies must also consider the potential effects on their brand and reputation, and how the divestiture may affect their strategic objectives.

In some cases, divestiture can be beneficial for a company, providing it with the opportunity to focus on its core business and free up resources to pursue new opportunities. It can also be beneficial for shareholders, as the divestiture may result in higher returns on their investments. However, divestiture can also result in layoffs, decreased employee morale, and market disruption. You should consider having a business attorney assist you if you are seeking to do a divestiture strategy. A divestiture is a merger and acquisition strategy that can be beneficial for companies in certain situations. It is important for companies to be aware of the potential effects of divestiture, and to carefully consider the potential risks and rewards before making a decision.

Why Do A Merger or an Acquisition?

There are many reasons you would consider doing either a merger or an acquisition. We will address several reasons in turn.

Economies of Scale

Economies of scale are a key reason why companies choose to merge and acquire other businesses. Economies of scale refer to the cost savings achieved when a company increases its production or output. When a company merges or acquires another business, it is able to increase its production and output, allowing it to take advantage of the cost savings. By producing more with the same amount of resources, the company can reduce costs associated with producing additional products. Additionally, the company can benefit from shared resources and services, achieving even greater cost savings.

For example, a company that acquires another business may be able to combine their production processes, allowing them to produce more with fewer resources. This can reduce the need to buy new equipment or hire additional employees, resulting in cost savings. Furthermore, the merged company may be able to take advantage of the economies of scale associated with the new business’s existing production facilities, allowing them to produce more with fewer resources.

In addition to cost savings, economies of scale can also result in greater competitive advantages. By combining production processes, the company can produce more efficiently and effectively, allowing them to stay ahead of the competition. Furthermore, by merging with other businesses, the company can access a larger customer base, resulting in greater sales and profits.

Overall, economies of scale are a key reason why companies choose to merge and acquire other businesses. By combining production processes and resources, the company can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and gain competitive advantages. Additionally, the company can access a larger customer base, leading to increased sales and profits.

Gaining Market Share

Gaining market share is a key motivator for many mergers and acquisitions. Through a merger or acquisition, two companies can combine their resources, capabilities, and customer bases to create a larger, stronger entity. This larger company may have competitive advantages that allow it to take market share from its competitors. For example, a merged company may have increased economies of scale, which can result in lower costs, greater efficiency, and higher profits. Additionally, a merged company may have greater access to capital and new technological capabilities, both of which can help it to gain market share.

In addition to gaining market share, a merged company may also benefit from synergy. Synergy refers to the combined effect of two entities working together, which is often greater than the sum of their parts. For example, a merged company may have access to new markets, technologies, or customer bases that would not have been available to them as separate entities. This increased access can create new opportunities for growth and market expansion.

Finally, a merged company may also be able to gain market share by eliminating competition. By merging with a competitor, a company can eliminate potential rivals and thereby increase its own market share. Additionally, the merged company may be able to capitalize on the resources and capabilities of the other company, further increasing its competitive advantage.

Overall, gaining market share is a key motivator for many mergers and acquisitions, as it can give the combined company access to new markets, technologies, and customers. Additionally, the merged company may benefit from increased economies of scale and synergy, as well as the elimination of competition. Thus, the strategic pursuit of market share can often be an important factor in deciding whether to pursue a merger or acquisition.

Mergers and Acquisitions Lawyer Consultation

Are you doing Mergers and Acquisitions? If so, you should consider hiring Jeremy Eveland as either your business consultant or attorney. He has extensive experience in this field and would be a great asset to the team. Jeremy is a skilled negotiator, capable of finding creative solutions to complex situations and transactions. He has an understanding of the legal frameworks that govern M&A transactions, as well as a keen eye for financial analysis and market trends. He is also well-versed in the different types of M&A transactions and knows how to structure deals for maximum benefit for all parties involved. Jeremy is a team player and a good communicator. He is able to explain complex topics in an easy to understand manner and is always willing to listen to the opinions and perspectives of his colleagues. He is also an enthusiastic and passionate leader, inspiring others to work together to achieve their collective goals. Given his experience, track record, and strong interpersonal and communication skills, you should consider his help when doing Mergers and Acquisitions. He will be a valuable asset to the team and will help to ensure that all financial transactions are completed successfully.

M&A Attorney Consultation

When you need legal help with Mergers and Acquisitions, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472

Home

Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah

Last Updated: July 20, 2026

Do you need help from a Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah business owners trust? Call attorney Jeremy Eveland at (801) 613-1472 for a free consultation. Business succession planning decides who owns, controls, and runs your company after you retire, become disabled, or pass away. Without a written plan, that decision gets made by a probate court, by a bank, or by whichever family member argues loudest.

This guide explains how business succession works under Utah law, which documents actually control the transfer, how owners fund a buyout, and what it costs to wait. If you own a company in West Jordan, South Jordan, Riverton, or anywhere in Salt Lake County, the planning steps below apply to you.

What a Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah Owners Hire Actually Does

Succession planning is not one document. It is a set of agreements that have to point in the same direction. A business succession attorney reviews what you already have, finds the contradictions, and rewrites the pieces so the transfer happens the way you intend.

The core work includes:

Reading your governing documents. Your operating agreement, bylaws, or partnership agreement usually contains transfer restrictions that override your will. If your operating agreement says membership interests cannot transfer without unanimous consent, a bequest in your will does not defeat that restriction.
Drafting or fixing a buy-sell agreement. This is the single most important succession document for any company with more than one owner.
Coordinating the business plan with the estate plan. A revocable trust that never receives the LLC interest does nothing. Funding is where most plans fail.
Building the funding mechanism. Life insurance, disability buyout coverage, installment notes, or a sinking fund.
Handling the tax and valuation questions alongside your CPA so the price in the agreement is defensible.
Planning management succession, which is separate from ownership succession and frequently overlooked.

Why Business Succession Planning Fails Without a Lawyer

Most closely held companies in Utah have some version of a plan in the owner’s head. The plan collapses on contact with reality for predictable reasons.

The documents contradict each other. A will leaves the company to three children. The operating agreement requires the surviving members to approve any new member. The result is litigation between the estate and the surviving owners while the company loses customers.

Nobody funded the buyout. An agreement that obligates the company to buy a deceased owner’s 40% interest is worthless if the company cannot write that check. Forced buyouts drain working capital or trigger a fire sale.

The valuation formula is stale. A fixed dollar price set in 2014 has no relationship to what the company is worth in 2026. Agreements should use a formula or a required periodic appraisal, not a number.

The successor was never trained. Transferring stock is easy. Transferring vendor relationships, bank credit, key licenses, and employee loyalty takes years of deliberate handoff.

Personal guarantees were never addressed. If you personally guaranteed the lease and the line of credit, selling or gifting your ownership does not release you. The lender has to agree, and that is negotiated, not assumed.

The Buy-Sell Agreement: The Center of Every Succession Plan

A buy-sell agreement is a contract among the owners, and often the company itself, that controls what happens to an ownership interest when a triggering event occurs. It is the closest thing to a prenuptial agreement that a business has.

Triggering Events to Cover

Death of an owner
Long-term disability or incapacity
Retirement or voluntary withdrawal
Termination of employment
Divorce, where a spouse could receive an interest in a marital property division
Personal bankruptcy or a creditor charging order
An outside party offering to buy one owner out
Loss of a professional license, for licensed practices

Three Basic Structures

Cross-purchase. The remaining owners individually buy the departing owner’s interest. Each owner typically holds a policy on each other owner. It gives the buyers a stepped-up basis but gets unwieldy fast past three owners.

Entity redemption. The company itself buys back the interest. Simpler to administer with several owners because the company holds one policy per owner, but the surviving owners get no basis increase and corporate-level tax issues can arise.

Hybrid or wait-and-see. The agreement gives the company the first option and the remaining owners the backup option, with the decision deferred until the trigger actually happens. This is often the practical choice when the tax picture may change.

Valuation Methods

The agreement should say exactly how the price gets set. Common approaches include an agreed value certificate updated annually, a formula tied to earnings or revenue multiples, a mandatory independent appraisal at the time of the trigger, or a book value method with defined adjustments. A business valuation that is credible under scrutiny matters both for the buyout price and for federal estate tax reporting.

How Utah Law Affects Your Succession Plan

The entity statute you formed under supplies the default rules that apply when your documents are silent. Defaults are almost never what an owner would have chosen.

LLCs. Utah limited liability companies are governed by the Utah Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, Utah Code Title 48, Chapter 3a. Under the default rules, a transferee of a membership interest generally receives only the economic rights to distributions, not management or voting rights, unless the other members consent. That means an heir can end up with a check but no seat at the table, or with no ability to force a sale, depending on how the agreement is written.

Corporations. Utah corporations operate under the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act, Utah Code Title 16, Chapter 10a. Shares are freely transferable unless a shareholders agreement, the bylaws, or a legend on the certificate restricts transfer. Most family companies want restrictions; the statute does not supply them for you.

Probate. If an interest passes through a will rather than a trust or a buy-sell, it goes through probate under the Utah Uniform Probate Code, Title 75. Probate is public, it takes months, and the personal representative may lack authority to make fast operating decisions. Our article on how long probate takes if there is no will explains the timeline in detail.

Marital property. Utah is an equitable distribution state. A divorce can put a portion of a business interest in play, which is why divorce belongs on the trigger list in every buy-sell agreement.

Family Business Succession in West Jordan Utah

Family companies carry a problem that partnerships do not: fairness and equality are not the same thing. One child runs the business. Two do not. Leaving all three an equal share of the company guarantees conflict, because the working child sees the others as passengers and the others see the working child as taking a salary out of their inheritance.

Workable approaches include:

Equalize outside the business. Leave the company to the child who runs it and balance the other children with life insurance, real estate, or retirement assets.
Split voting and nonvoting interests. The operating child receives voting control; the others receive nonvoting economic interests with a defined path to be bought out.
Separate the real estate. Many owners hold the building in a separate LLC and lease it back. Non-operating heirs can inherit the property LLC and receive rent without touching operations.
Use a written family employment policy. Define who can work in the business, what qualifications are required, and how compensation gets set before the transition, not after.

Only a minority of family businesses survive into the second generation, and fewer reach the third. The difference is almost always whether the transition was documented and rehearsed years in advance.

Selling to a Third Party or to Your Employees

Not every owner has a successor in the family. Two alternatives are common.

Third-party sale. This requires two to three years of preparation: clean financial statements, resolved litigation, assignable contracts, documented processes, and a management team that does not depend on you. Buyers discount heavily for owner dependence. Expect a letter of intent, a diligence period, and a purchase agreement with representations, warranties, indemnities, and often an escrow holdback and a noncompete.

Management or employee buyout. Key employees usually lack cash, so these deals are financed with seller notes, earnouts, or a phased transfer of equity over several years. The seller carries risk until the note is paid, which makes security interests, personal guarantees from the buyers, and default remedies critical.

Disability and Emergency Succession

Owners plan for death and ignore disability, which is statistically more likely during working years. A complete plan includes a durable power of attorney that specifically authorizes business decisions, a written definition of disability in the buy-sell agreement with a waiting period, disability buyout insurance, and standing authority for someone to sign checks and payroll on day one.

Choosing that person carefully matters; see our guide on who to name as power of attorney in Utah. For the sudden-loss scenario, read death of a business owner in Utah and emergency succession.

Write an emergency succession memo and keep it where your family can find it: who to call, where the bank accounts are, who holds the passwords, which vendors must be paid immediately, and who has interim authority.

Tax Considerations in Business Succession

Tax drives structure. Coordinate every step with your CPA.

Federal estate tax. The exemption is indexed and has changed repeatedly. Confirm the current threshold with the IRS estate tax page before assuming your estate is exempt. Utah imposes no separate state estate tax.
Basis step-up. Assets held at death generally receive a basis adjustment to fair market value. Lifetime gifts carry over the donor’s basis. This single difference often decides whether to gift now or transfer at death.
Entity type. S corporations have shareholder eligibility limits, and a transfer to the wrong type of trust can terminate the election. Check eligibility before any transfer.
Insurance proceeds. How life insurance is owned affects whether proceeds are included in the estate and whether a corporate-owned policy creates alternative minimum tax exposure.
Valuation discounts. Discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability can reduce transfer tax value, but they must be supported by a qualified appraisal.

Trusts are frequently the vehicle for the transfer. See our overview of trust administration in Utah and what a QTIP trust does in estate planning.

Business Succession Planning Timeline

Five or more years out. Choose the successor path. Begin training. Clean up the entity records, minutes, and cap table. Set the valuation method.

Three to five years out. Execute or update the buy-sell agreement. Put funding in place while you are still insurable. Reduce owner dependence by documenting processes and building the management team.

One to three years out. Begin transferring authority, not just equity. Introduce the successor to the bank, key customers, and vendors. Renegotiate personal guarantees. Update the estate plan so it matches the business documents.

The final year. Complete the transfer. Confirm licenses, permits, insurance, and contract assignments carry over. Document the seller’s post-closing role, whether that is consulting, a board seat, or a clean exit.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Relying on a template operating agreement downloaded years ago and never read since
Naming a successor verbally and never writing it down
Leaving the buy-sell unfunded
Failing to update the plan after a divorce, a death, a new partner, or a major growth year
Ignoring the difference between ownership and management
Assuming a will controls an interest that the operating agreement restricts
Waiting until a health event forces the conversation, when options narrow and leverage disappears

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I start business succession planning?

Now, regardless of your age. The plan takes three to five years to execute properly, and the events that trigger it are not scheduled. Owners who start early keep every option open; owners who start after a diagnosis have far fewer.

Does my will control what happens to my business?

Often not. Transfer restrictions in an operating agreement, bylaws, or shareholders agreement generally control over a will. If those documents conflict with your estate plan, the operating documents usually win and your family inherits a lawsuit.

How much does a business succession plan cost?

It depends on the number of owners, entity type, and whether valuation and tax planning are required. A buy-sell agreement for a two-owner company is a much smaller project than a multi-generational transfer with trusts and gifting. The cost of planning is consistently a fraction of the cost of litigation or a forced sale.

What happens if I have no succession plan?

The interest passes under your will or under Utah’s intestacy statutes, likely through probate. Surviving owners may be forced into partnership with your heirs, or your heirs may hold an interest with no voting rights and no buyer. Banks can call loans, and key employees leave during the uncertainty.

Can I keep the business in the family and still treat my children fairly?

Yes, but fairness usually requires equalizing outside the company rather than splitting it equally. Life insurance, real estate held in a separate entity, and nonvoting interests are the standard tools.

Do I need a new plan if I already have a trust?

You need the trust to actually own the interest and the operating agreement to permit that ownership. An unfunded trust and a restrictive operating agreement are the two most common reasons a plan fails at the moment it is needed.

Speak With a Business Succession Lawyer in West Jordan Utah

If you own a business in West Jordan, Utah and have not documented what happens to it when you stop running it, that is the gap worth closing this year. A Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah owners can meet with will review your existing documents, identify the conflicts, and build a plan your family and partners can rely on.

Call attorney Jeremy Eveland at (801) 613-1472 for a free consultation on business succession planning, buy-sell agreements, and business estate planning.

Areas We Serve

We assist business owners throughout Utah, including West Jordan, South Jordan, Salt Lake City, West Valley City, Sandy, Draper, Riverton, Herriman, Murray, Taylorsville, Midvale, Bluffdale, Lehi, American Fork, Orem, Provo, Bountiful, Layton, Ogden, Park City, St. George, and Logan.

About West Jordan, Utah

West Jordan is a city in Salt Lake County, Utah, located in the southwestern portion of the Salt Lake Valley along the Jordan River. It is one of the largest cities in the state by population and supports a broad base of manufacturing, construction, retail, healthcare, and professional service businesses, many of them family owned and operated across multiple generations. Learn more about the city from West Jordan, Utah on Wikipedia.