Tag Archives: certain circumstances

Limited Liability Companies

The limited liability company (LLC) is a relatively new form of business entity that has become increasingly popular in the United States over the past two decades. In particular, Utah has become a hotbed for LLCs due to its favorable business environment and favorable tax and liability laws. This article will discuss the basics of limited liability companies in Utah and how they are regulated by the state.

A limited liability company is a form of business entity that provides limited liability to its owners, similar to that of a corporation. In Utah, LLCs are defined and regulated by the Utah Revised Limited Liability Company Act (URLLCA), which was enacted in 2001. The URLLCA sets forth the formation and operating requirements for LLCs in Utah, including the procedures for formation and dissolution, management, ownership, and taxation.

Under the URLLCA, an LLC is formed when a person or group of persons files a Certificate of Formation with the Utah Division of Corporations and Commercial Code. The Certificate must include the name of the LLC, the address of its registered office, the names and addresses of its managers or members, and the purpose of the LLC. Once the Certificate is filed and accepted by the Division, the LLC is officially formed and may begin conducting business in Utah.

Under the URLLCA, the LLC provides its members with limited liability. This means that members of the LLC are not typically liable for the debts and obligations of the LLC, except in certain circumstances such as fraud or violations of the URLLCA. Additionally, the LLC provides its members with the ability to manage and control the LLC. The URLLCA also sets forth the rules governing the management of the LLC, such as the election of a manager or managers, the formation of quorums, and the adoption of operating agreements.

In addition to providing limited liability to its members, the URLLCA sets forth the rules governing the taxation of LLCs in Utah. Under the URLLCA, LLCs are required to pay state income taxes on their profits. The URLLCA also sets forth the rules governing the taxation of distributions to members of the LLC, as well as the taxation of capital gains from the sale of LLC interests.

The URLLCA also sets forth the rules governing the dissolution of LLCs in Utah. In general, an LLC may be dissolved by filing a Certificate of Dissolution with the Utah Division of Corporations and Commercial Code. The Certificate must include the name of the LLC, the address of its registered office, and the reason for dissolution. Once the Certificate is filed and accepted by the Division, the LLC is officially dissolved and all of its assets must be distributed to its members in accordance with the terms of the operating agreement.

The URLLCA also sets forth the rules governing the rights and responsibilities of members of LLCs in Utah. This includes the rights of members to participate in the management of the LLC, to receive distributions from the LLC, and to transfer their interests in the LLC. Additionally, the URLLCA sets forth the duties of members, such as the duty to act in the best interests of the LLC and the duty to pay taxes on distributions from the LLC.

Limited Liability Company Attorneys

Business Attorneys are often asked how limited liability works, because this is often one of the greatest advantages to forming an entity that offers this type of protection (limited liability partnership, Limited Liability Company, corporation, etc). Limited liability basically protects the business owner for the negligence of his or her employees. In other words, the limited liability status of a company does not protect the business owner from liabilities that are a result of his or her personal negligence. Company owners that actually take part in the daily activities of a business should be aware of this fact; because this makes almost as though the business is a sole proprietorship.

Limited liability, on the other hand, is one of the biggest advantages of forming a corporation, or LLC, even if it only protects the business owner from his or her employee’s negligence. While any employee’s misconduct is likely outside the scope of employment, and would not make the business owner liable, the limited liability status is important for protecting the business owner’s personal assets. Failure to form the business properly might result in the business being recognized as a partnership, where the business owners would be joint and severally liable for the business’ debts (including judgments against the business); A Business law expert is useful for ensuring that your business is formed and operated properly.

Clients often wonder what causes court not to recognize limited liability; this is known as piercing the corporate veil. Traditionally piercing the corporate veil is a remedy the court uses after considering certain factors. To avoid the risk of having your company’s limited liability status go unrecognized it is important that the business adhere to corporate formalities. Corporate formalities are those things which are usually done when conducting a legitimate business. This includes adequate record keeping, keeping the business owner’s personal funds separate from the operating funds of the business, acting in accordance with bylaws (for a corporation) or an operating agreement (for a LLC) for the business in question, and treating the company’s assets as though they were your own. An experienced lawyer usually prepares these documents for record keeping purposes and can help ensure that the company is staying compliant. The other thing to avoid is what is called undercapitalization, and is often found where businesses fail to properly maintain adequate insurance coverage in the case of any possible misfortune. The main point here is that the business was not formed as a limited liability entity to avoid potential business debts arising from judgments against the business.

Because businesses are formed under State law, a business attorney can also advise on the advantages of forming the LLC in different states which can have certain benefits. Some of the benefits fall into different categories like more developed case law, or more developed statutes. Owners of large companies surely take advantage of being able to form an entity in different places; this is the reason you see many large corporations that where incorporated in Utah.

The business formation process can be a very challenging, and one may find regulations, permits and contracts totally confusing. However, all of these are not illogical obstacles towards establishing your company as they are just part of the many requirements that allow authorities to monitor or keep track of every business formation occurring in one place while informing the government that has jurisdiction.

What Is a Limited Liability Company (LLC)?

A Limited Liability Company or LLC is a business structure in which the owners or members have limited liability with respect to the actions of the company. An LLC offers the members the benefit of personal liability protection, meaning that the business liability cannot be recovered from the personal assets of the owners.
An LLC is formed and operated under state law. Its characteristics are similar to that of a corporation and a partnership business. Its dissolution too is governed by the state’s law.

The Basics of Forming a Limited Liability Company (LLC)

The thought of “being your own boss” is sure exciting and if you plan to do it by setting up your business and are ready with a business plan, the next crucial step is deciding the right business structure. This decision has far-reaching repercussions for the business and thus requires careful selection. The factors like personal liability, regulations, tax treatment, etc are governed by the form of your business entity which could be a Sole Proprietorship, Corporation, Partnership, or a Limited Liability Company (LLC).

One of the easy, efficient, and fast ways to start a company is to set up a Limited Liability Company (LLC). Let’s explore what exactly is an LLC, its suitability, advantages, and disadvantages, along with other fundamental factors that can help you decide if an LLC is right for you and your business.

Advantages of an LLC

Registering your company as an LLC has many benefits. Let’s take a look at some of the biggest advantages below.

Limited Liability

This is one of the features of an LLC in which it resembles a corporation. LLC provides its owners a protective shield against business debt and liability.
Let’s take an example; there is a shoe store “boot & boot” owned by Jimmy that loses its customers to one of the more fancy store around the corner. The business is not doing well and the company hasn’t paid rent for the last eight months and bills for three shipments of shoes. Thus, “boot & boot” owes approximately $75,000 to its creditors who have filled a lawsuit against the company.

In this case, the creditors have full right to claim the money owed from the company but have no right to Jimmy’s personal assets (bank deposits or gold or real estate). In an LLC, only the company’s assets can be liquidated to repay the debt and not the owners. This is a big advantage that is not provided by a sole proprietorship or partnership where owners and the business are legally considered the same adding vulnerability of personal assets.

Taxation

The company is not taxed directly by IRS as an LLC is not considered a separate tax entity. Instead, the tax liability is on the members who pay through their personal income tax. Let’s look at an example.

Say “boot & boot” has two members and has made net profits to the tune of $60,000 in a year. The net profits will be divided into two (number of members) and this amount will be taxed as their personal income depending upon their overall tax liability. Because of non recognition of LLC as a business entity for taxation purposes, the tax return has to be filed as a corporation, partnership or sole proprietorship.

Remember that certain LLCs are automatically classified by IRS as a corporation for tax purposes, so be sure to know if your business falls in this category. Those LLCs that not automatically classified as a corporation can pick the business entity of choice by filing the Form 8832. The same form is used in case the LLC wants to change the classification status.

Fewer Hassles

Among all forms of companies, starting an LLC is easier, with fewer complexities, paperwork, and costs. This form of company comes with a lot of operational ease with less record-keeping and compliance issues. LLCs also provide a lot of freedom in management as there is no requirement of having a board of directors, annual meetings, or maintaining strict record books. These features reduce unnecessary hassles and help save a lot of time and effort.

The formation of an LLC broadly requires filing the “articles of organization” which is a document including basic information like business name, address, members. The filing is done with the Secretary of State for most states and has an associated filing fee.

Next comes creating an Operating Agreement, which though is not mandatory in most states but is recommended especially for multi-member LLCs. On registration of the business, other licenses and permits have to be obtained.

Additionally, some states like Arizona and New York require publishing about the LLC formation in the local newspaper.

Flexibility in Allocation

LLC provides a lot of flexibility when it comes to investing as well as profit sharing.

In an LLC, members can opt to invest in a different proportion than their ownership percentage i.e. a person who owns 25% of the LLC, need not contribute money in the same proportion for initial investment. This can be done by creating an operating agreement, which states percentages of company profits (and losses) for each member regardless of the amounts of their initial investments. So it’s possible to have an outside investor put money in the business without ownership.

The same applies to the distribution of profits where LLC members have the flexibility to decide the allocation of profits. The distribution of profits can be in a different proportion than ownership. A certain member may take a bigger chunk of profits by consensus for the extra hours or effort they have put into carrying out the business.

Disadvantages

While a limited liability company (LLC) offers an edge over some of the other forms of business entity, there are also some drawbacks which need to be looked at before selecting an LLC as the business structure.

Limited Life

The life of an LLC is limited by the tenure of its members. While there can be variations across states, in most of them the business is dissolved or ceases to exist when a member departs an LLC further requiring the other members to complete the remaining business or legal obligations needed to close the business. The rest of the members can choose to set up a new LLC or part ways. This weakness of an LLC can be overcome by including appropriate provisions in the operating agreement.

Self-Employment Taxes

The members of an LLC have to pay the self-employed tax contributions towards Medicare and Social Security as they are considered as self-employed. Due to this, the net income of the business is subject to this tax. To avoid this, depending upon the business turnover and tax burden, the entity can choose to be taxed like a corporation if it works out more beneficial. Consult an accountant before making this choice.

Fees

The fee which is typically paid by an LLC as initial costs or ongoing charges is more than that for business entities like sole proprietorship or general partnership but less than what a C-corporation has to pay. The various types of fees include applicable state filing fees, ongoing fees, and annual report fees.

The URLLCA sets forth the rules governing the formation, management, taxation, and dissolution of limited liability companies in Utah. These rules provide LLCs and their members with the protection of limited liability and the ability to manage and control the LLC. Additionally, the URLLCA sets forth the rules governing the taxation of LLCs and the rights and responsibilities of members. As such, the URLLCA provides a comprehensive framework for the formation and operation of LLCs in Utah.

Areas We Serve

We serve individuals and businesses in the following locations:

Salt Lake City Utah
West Valley City Utah
Provo Utah
West Jordan Utah
Orem Utah
Sandy Utah
Ogden Utah
St. George Utah
Layton Utah
South Jordan Utah
Lehi Utah
Millcreek Utah
Taylorsville Utah
Logan Utah
Murray Utah
Draper Utah
Bountiful Utah
Riverton Utah
Herriman Utah
Spanish Fork Utah
Roy Utah
Pleasant Grove Utah
Kearns Utah
Tooele Utah
Cottonwood Heights Utah
Midvale Utah
Springville Utah
Eagle Mountain Utah
Cedar City Utah
Kaysville Utah
Clearfield Utah
Holladay Utah
American Fork Utah
Syracuse Utah
Saratoga Springs Utah
Magna Utah
Washington Utah
South Salt Lake Utah
Farmington Utah
Clinton Utah
North Salt Lake Utah
Payson Utah
North Ogden Utah
Brigham City Utah
Highland Utah
Centerville Utah
Hurricane Utah
South Ogden Utah
Heber Utah
West Haven Utah
Bluffdale Utah
Santaquin Utah
Smithfield Utah
Woods Cross Utah
Grantsville Utah
Lindon Utah
North Logan Utah
West Point Utah
Vernal Utah
Alpine Utah
Cedar Hills Utah
Pleasant View Utah
Mapleton Utah
Stansbury Par Utah
Washington Terrace Utah
Riverdale Utah
Hooper Utah
Tremonton Utah
Ivins Utah
Park City Utah
Price Utah
Hyrum Utah
Summit Park Utah
Salem Utah
Richfield Utah
Santa Clara Utah
Providence Utah
South Weber Utah
Vineyard Utah
Ephraim Utah
Roosevelt Utah
Farr West Utah
Plain City Utah
Nibley Utah
Enoch Utah
Harrisville Utah
Snyderville Utah
Fruit Heights Utah
Nephi Utah
White City Utah
West Bountiful Utah
Sunset Utah
Moab Utah
Midway Utah
Perry Utah
Kanab Utah
Hyde Park Utah
Silver Summit Utah
La Verkin Utah
Morgan Utah

Limited Liability Companies Consultation

When you need help with Limited Liability Companies call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472 for a consultation.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472

Home

Charitable Estate Planning Trusts

Estate Planning Lawyer Sandy Utah

Probate

Preferred Stock

Business Lawyer Orem Utah

Using Disclaimers In Estate Planning

Business Contract Attorney

Legal Compliance

Joint Tenancy

Strategic Business Plan

Quiet Title

Construction Disputes

Exit Strategies

Business Succession Lawyer Spanish Fork Utah

Sale of Company

Corporate Attorney St. George Utah

Asset Protection

Corporate Attorney Ogden Utah

Utah Code 76-10-2402

What Is Utah Code 34-56-101

What Is Utah Code 39-1-36(1)

What Is Utah Code 48-3a-409?

Executor Lawyer

Business Strategy and Consulting

Asset Purchase Agreement

Business Succession Lawyer Roy Utah

Corporate Attorney Sandy Utah

Limited Liability Companies

Promissory Estoppel

Contract Lawyer

“Secure Your Promises with Promissory Estoppel!”

Introduction

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a person from denying or going back on a promise they have made. It is a form of equitable estoppel, which is a legal principle that prevents a person from denying or going back on a statement or promise they have made. This doctrine is used to prevent a person from taking advantage of another person by making a promise and then going back on it. It is an important legal concept that is used to protect people from being taken advantage of in contractual agreements.

Estoppel in English Law: Examining the Legal Principles of Promissory Estoppel

Promissory estoppel is a legal principle in English law that prevents a party from going back on their word or promise. It is a form of equitable relief that is used to prevent a party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of another. The doctrine of promissory estoppel is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to go back on their word or promise if it would be unfair to do so.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel was first established in the case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd (1947). In this case, the defendant had agreed to reduce the rent payable on a property during the war years. After the war, the defendant sought to recover the full amount of rent that had been waived. The court held that the defendant was estopped from doing so, as it would be unfair to allow them to go back on their promise.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel has since been applied in a number of cases. In order for the doctrine to apply, three elements must be present: (1) a clear and unambiguous promise; (2) reliance on the promise; and (3) detriment suffered as a result of the reliance.

The first element requires that the promise must be clear and unambiguous. This means that the promise must be specific and not open to interpretation. The second element requires that the promise must have been relied upon by the other party. This means that the other party must have acted in a way that was reasonable in reliance on the promise. The third element requires that the other party must have suffered a detriment as a result of their reliance on the promise.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel is an important legal principle in English law. It is used to prevent a party from going back on their word or promise if it would be unfair to do so. The doctrine requires that three elements must be present in order for it to apply: a clear and unambiguous promise, reliance on the promise, and detriment suffered as a result of the reliance.

Legal Definition of Promissory Estoppel in Contract Law

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that is used in contract law to prevent a party from going back on their word. It is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to go back on their promise if another party has relied on that promise to their detriment.

Promissory estoppel is a form of equitable estoppel, which is a legal doctrine that prevents a party from denying or asserting something that is contrary to what they have previously said or done. In the context of contract law, promissory estoppel is used to enforce a promise that was made, even if there is no formal contract in place.

In order for promissory estoppel to be applied, the following elements must be present:

1. A clear and unambiguous promise was made by one party to another.

2. The promise was relied upon by the other party to their detriment.

3. The reliance was reasonable and foreseeable.

4. The promise was not fulfilled.

If these elements are present, then the party who made the promise may be estopped from denying or going back on their promise. This means that the promise may be enforced by a court, even if there is no formal contract in place.

Promissory estoppel is an important legal doctrine that is used to protect parties from being taken advantage of by another party who goes back on their word. It is an important tool for enforcing promises that were made, even if there is no formal contract in place.

The High Trees Case: Examining the Impact of Promissory Estoppel on Contract Law

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that has been used to modify the traditional rules of contract law. It is based on the principle that a promise made without consideration should be enforced if the promisor should have reasonably expected the promisee to rely on the promise and the promisee did in fact rely on the promise to their detriment. This doctrine was first established in the English case of High Trees House Ltd. v. Montefiore (1947).

In the High Trees case, the defendant, Mr. Montefiore, had leased a property to the plaintiff, High Trees House Ltd., for a period of 10 years. During the war, the plaintiff was unable to pay the full rent due to the economic hardship caused by the war. The defendant agreed to accept a reduced rent for the duration of the war. After the war, the defendant attempted to collect the full rent that was originally agreed upon. The plaintiff argued that the defendant was estopped from doing so because of the promise to accept a reduced rent during the war.

The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that the defendant was estopped from collecting the full rent due to the promise made during the war. The court held that the defendant should have reasonably expected the plaintiff to rely on the promise and that the plaintiff had in fact relied on the promise to their detriment. The court also held that the defendant was not entitled to the full rent due to the promise made during the war.

The High Trees case established the doctrine of promissory estoppel and has had a significant impact on contract law. This doctrine allows for the modification of traditional contract law rules in certain circumstances. It allows for the enforcement of promises made without consideration if the promisor should have reasonably expected the promisee to rely on the promise and the promisee did in fact rely on the promise to their detriment. This doctrine has been used in a variety of cases to modify the traditional rules of contract law.

The High Trees case is an important example of how the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be used to modify the traditional rules of contract law. This case demonstrates the importance of considering the circumstances of each case when determining whether a promise should be enforced. It also serves as a reminder that promises made without consideration can still be enforced if the promisor should have reasonably expected the promisee to rely on the promise and the promisee did in fact rely on the promise to their detriment.

Examining the Requirements of Promissory Estoppel: What You Need to Know

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that is used to enforce a promise that was made without a formal contract. It is a way for a court to enforce a promise that was made in order to prevent injustice. In order for a court to enforce a promise under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, there are certain requirements that must be met.

First, there must be a clear and unambiguous promise that was made by one party to another. The promise must be definite and not vague or uncertain. The promise must also be made with the intention of creating a legal obligation.

Second, the promise must be relied upon by the other party. The other party must have acted in reliance on the promise, and must have suffered a detriment as a result of that reliance.

Third, the reliance must be reasonable. The other party must have had a reasonable expectation that the promise would be kept.

Finally, the reliance must be foreseeable. The promisor must have known or should have known that the other party would rely on the promise.

These are the basic requirements of promissory estoppel. It is important to understand these requirements in order to determine whether a promise can be enforced under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.

Exploring the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel: A Comprehensive Overview

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that is used to enforce a promise that would otherwise be unenforceable. It is a principle of equity that is used to prevent a person from going back on their word and to ensure that promises are kept. This doctrine is based on the idea that a person should not be allowed to go back on their word if it would cause another person to suffer a detriment.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel is based on the idea that a promise should be enforced if it would be unjust to allow the promisor to go back on their word. This doctrine is used to prevent a person from taking advantage of another person by making a promise that they do not intend to keep. It is also used to ensure that promises are kept and that people are held accountable for their actions.

In order for the doctrine of promissory estoppel to be applied, there must be a promise that is made by one party to another. The promise must be clear and unambiguous and must be made with the intention of creating a legal obligation. The promise must also be relied upon by the other party and must cause them to suffer a detriment if the promise is not kept.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel is used in a variety of situations. It is often used in contract law to enforce promises that are not otherwise enforceable. It is also used in tort law to prevent a person from taking advantage of another person by making a promise that they do not intend to keep.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel is an important legal principle that is used to ensure that promises are kept and that people are held accountable for their actions. It is a principle of equity that is used to prevent a person from taking advantage of another person by making a promise that they do not intend to keep. This doctrine is used in a variety of situations and is an important tool for ensuring that promises are kept and that people are held accountable for their actions.

Hiring a Contract Lawyer to Help with Promissory Estoppel

Promissory estoppel is a legal concept that can be used to enforce a promise made by one party to another. It is a powerful tool that can be used to protect the rights of both parties in a contract. When a contract is breached, the party that has been wronged can use promissory estoppel to seek damages or other remedies.

When faced with a situation involving promissory estoppel, it is important to seek the advice of a qualified contract lawyer. A contract lawyer can help you understand the legal implications of the situation and advise you on the best course of action. They can also help you draft a contract that will protect your rights and ensure that the other party is held accountable for any promises they make.

A contract lawyer can also help you understand the legal implications of promissory estoppel. They can explain the concept to you in detail and help you understand how it applies to your situation. They can also help you determine if the other party has breached the contract and advise you on the best way to proceed.

Finally, a contract lawyer can help you negotiate a settlement or other remedy if the other party has breached the contract. They can help you understand the legal implications of the situation and advise you on the best way to proceed.

Hiring a contract lawyer to help with promissory estoppel is a wise decision. A contract lawyer can provide you with the legal advice and guidance you need to protect your rights and ensure that the other party is held accountable for any promises they make.

Q&A

Q: What is promissory estoppel?

A: Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a person from going back on their word or promise when it would cause harm or injustice to another person. It is a form of equitable estoppel that is used to enforce promises that would otherwise be unenforceable due to a lack of consideration.

Q: What are the elements of promissory estoppel?

A: The elements of promissory estoppel are: (1) a clear and unambiguous promise; (2) reliance on the promise; (3) detriment caused by the reliance; and (4) injustice can only be avoided by enforcing the promise.

Q: What is the difference between promissory estoppel and contract law?

A: The main difference between promissory estoppel and contract law is that promissory estoppel does not require consideration to be enforced. In contract law, consideration is required for a contract to be enforceable.

Q: What are some examples of promissory estoppel?

A: Some examples of promissory estoppel include a promise to pay a debt, a promise to perform a service, or a promise to provide a benefit.

Q: What are the remedies for promissory estoppel?

A: The remedies for promissory estoppel are typically limited to the damages that were caused by the reliance on the promise. This means that the person who relied on the promise can only recover the amount of money or benefit that they lost as a result of relying on the promise.

Q: Is promissory estoppel a contract?

A: No, promissory estoppel is not a contract. It is a legal doctrine that is used to enforce promises that would otherwise be unenforceable due to a lack of consideration.