Tag Archives: bid

Construction Law

Construction law is a subcategory of Business Law. Utah construction law is a complex area of legal practice that encompasses a wide range of issues, from contracts and bidding to dispute resolution and litigation. We will provide an overview of the legal framework of construction law in Utah and discuss the roles of lawyers, contractors, and other stakeholders in the construction industry. We will also discuss some of the legal issues that arise in construction projects, with a particular focus on bid protests, dispute resolution, and construction defects. Finally, we will consider the resources available to construction lawyers, such as the American Bar Association’s Forum on Construction Law, free classes, and how-to guides.

Legislative Framework

The laws governing construction in Utah are relatively complex and are largely based on state statutes, court decisions, and administrative regulations. Utah’s Construction Law Statutes (UTC) generally provide the framework for the construction industry, while the Utah Courts have issued decisions that have further clarified the legal landscape. The state has also adopted a number of administrative rules related to construction projects, such as those governing contracts, bidding, and dispute resolution.

In addition to the state laws, the American Bar Association (ABA) has established a Forum on Construction Law, which provides additional guidance to construction lawyers and other stakeholders in the construction industry. The Forum publishes a variety of resources, including a second edition of the ABA’s Construction Law Statutes and Regulations, as well as a series of free classes and how-to guides.

Roles of Lawyers, Contractors, and Other Stakeholders

Construction law is a highly specialized field of legal practice that requires knowledge of both the legal framework and the practical aspects of the construction industry. Construction lawyers typically provide legal advice and representation to clients, such as contractors, architects, developers, and other stakeholders in the construction industry. They may also represent clients in court proceedings, such as bid protests and other disputes.

Contractors and other stakeholders in the construction industry have an important role to play in the legal process. They are responsible for understanding the legal requirements of their projects, such as bidding and contracting, and for complying with applicable laws and regulations. They must also be aware of their rights and obligations under contracts and other legal documents.

Lawyers play a critical role in Utah construction law. They provide legal advice and assistance to both contractors and clients in the industry, ensuring that their contracts are legally binding and that their projects are completed in compliance with state laws. Lawyers are also available to help resolve disputes between contractors and clients.

Lawyers who specialize in construction law can help contractors and clients in a variety of ways. Lawyers can draft and review contracts, advise clients on legal issues related to construction projects, help clients with bid protests, and represent clients in court or arbitration proceedings. Additionally, lawyers can help contractors and clients with dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration. They can also provide assistance with construction defects, liquidated damages, and claims of negligence.

The American Bar Association (ABA) offers a wide range of resources to attorneys specializing in construction law. The ABA offers free classes, how-to guides, and other resources to help lawyers better understand the legal issues involved in construction projects. Lawyers may also take advantage of the ABA’s Construction Lawyer Certification Program, which provides certification to lawyers who have demonstrated a high level of knowledge in construction law.

In addition to the resources provided by the ABA, lawyers may also pursue a construction law degree or an LL.M in construction law if the law school offers the program. Some lawyers will take continuing education classes (or CLE) to learn construction law as well as take cases with co-counsel to learn those areas. A law degree where the student studies construction law specifically (or draft a law journal article about it) can provide an in-depth understanding of the legal issues related to construction projects. Lawyers may also pursue a Legal Studies Certificate or something similar to further their legal education.

Lawyers may also take advantage of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) programs offered by the state. These programs provide a cost-effective and quick way to resolve disputes without having to go to court. Mediation and arbitration are two of the most common forms of ADR used in construction law. Mediators are typically lawyers who are knowledgeable about construction law and can help both sides in a dispute reach an agreement.

Finally, lawyers may also join the ABA’s Forum on the Construction Industry, a group of lawyers dedicated to providing resources and support to members of the construction industry. The Forum provides members with access to free classes and how-to guides, as well as a network of lawyers who specialize in construction law. The Forum also provides members with access to a variety of legal resources, such as Construction Law Second Edition, a comprehensive guide to construction law and related topics.

Legal Issues in Construction Projects

Construction projects often involve a variety of legal issues, such as bid protests, dispute resolution, and construction defects. Bid protests are a common issue in the construction industry, as contractors may challenge a bid award if they believe that the process was not conducted fairly or that the successful bidder did not comply with applicable laws and regulations. In such cases, the contractor may file a complaint with the appropriate state agency or court.

Dispute resolution is also a common issue in the construction industry. Disputes may arise over contractual issues, such as payment, performance, or materials, and may require the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute through ADR, they may need to pursue litigation.

Construction defects are a common issue in the construction industry. When a contractor is found to have breached their contract, they may be liable for damages, such as repair costs or lost profits. In some cases, contractors may also be liable for liquidated damages.

Utah Construction Lien Law

Construction lien law in Utah is complicated and requires careful attention to detail. Any contractor or subcontractor who wishes to exercise their right to file a lien on a project must adhere to certain procedures and must make sure they are familiar with the rules. It is highly recommended to consult with a lawyer experienced in Utah construction lien law before getting involved in a project.

The first step in protecting your rights is to file a pre-lien notice in the county recorder’s office. This pre-lien notice serves as a warning to the property owner that you have lien rights on the project and is an important step to protect your rights. The pre-lien must contain the name of the lien claimant, the name of the owner, the legal description of the property, and the estimated amount of the claim.

Once the pre-lien is filed, the next step is to register with the Utah Construction Registry. This registry is a statewide database that tracks all construction projects in Utah. Registration with the registry is free and provides contractors with important information regarding the project, including the name of the owner, the property address, and the estimated cost of the project.

After registering with the registry, the next step is to file a Notice of Commencement with the county recorder’s office. This notice must contain the name of the owner, the legal description of the property, the estimated cost of the project, and the name of the contractor. In addition, the Notice of Commencement must be published in the newspaper for at least five consecutive days. This Notice of Commencement serves to inform the public of the construction project and to provide notice to potential lien claimants that they have a right to file a lien on the property.

In order to file a lien in Utah, the lien claimant must wait 30 days after the Notice of Commencement has been published in the newspaper. After the 30-day waiting period, the lien claimant can file a lien with the county recorder’s office. The lien must contain the name of the lien claimant, the legal description of the property, the name of the owner, the estimated cost of the project, and the amount of the lien. The lien must also be published in the newspaper for at least five consecutive days before it can be enforced.

Construction lien law in Utah is complex and requires careful attention to detail. Contractors and subcontractors must make sure they are familiar with the procedures and must take the necessary steps to protect their rights. This includes filing a pre-lien notice in the county recorder’s office, registering with the Utah Construction Registry, and filing a Notice of Commencement in the newspaper. After the 30-day waiting period, the lien claimant may file a lien with the county recorder’s office. It is highly recommended to consult with a lawyer experienced in Utah construction lien law before getting involved in a project.

Resources for Construction Lawyers

Construction lawyers have access to a variety of resources to help them understand and navigate the complexities of construction law. The American Bar Association’s Forum on Construction Law provides a wealth of information and resources, including a second edition of the ABA’s Construction Law Statutes and Regulations and a series of free classes and how-to guides. Additionally, construction lawyers may consider pursuing a Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Legal Studies or a Construction Law Degree to further their knowledge and expertise.

Before you hire a construction law attorney, be sure that attorney has knowledge of both the legal framework and the practical aspects of the construction industry. Construction lawyers, contractors, and other stakeholders in the construction industry must be aware of the legal issues that may arise in construction projects, such as bid protests, dispute resolution, and construction defects. Additionally, there are a variety of resources available to construction lawyers, such as the American Bar Association’s Forum on Construction Law, free classes, and how-to guides. By understanding the legal framework and the resources available, construction lawyers can provide the best possible advice and representation to their clients.

Construction Law Attorney Consultation

When you need legal help with construction law in Utah, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472

Home

Offer and Acceptance

Contract law is a complex area of law, and understanding the basics of how an offer and acceptance works is key in being able to effectively navigate contract law. This essay will provide an insightful examination of how an offer and acceptance works under contract law in the state of Utah. It will begin by providing a brief overview of contract law in Utah and will then discuss the role of an offer and acceptance in the formation of a contract. The essay will then examine the elements that must be present for an offer and acceptance to be valid, as well as the legal rules that apply to the revocation and termination of an offer. Finally, it will provide a few examples of how an offer and acceptance works in practice in Utah.

Offer and acceptance is one of the most fundamental principles of contract law. In order for a contract to be legally binding, there must be an offer made by one party (the offeror) and an acceptance of that offer by the other party (the offeree). The offer must be communicated to the offeree in some form, usually through a letter, post, or other form of communication. Once the offeree has accepted the offer, the parties are bound to the terms of the contract.

One example of offer and acceptance is the case of Byrne v. Bindley. In this case, the defendant, Mr. Bindley, was the owner of a horse which he decided to put up for sale by auction. The auction was advertised in a local newspaper, and an auctioneer was hired to conduct the sale. On the day of the auction, the defendant’s nephew, Mr. Byrne, attended and made an offer of £70 for the horse, which was accepted by the auctioneer. Under the rule of offer and acceptance, this was seen as a legally binding contract between the parties, even though the defendant was not present at the auction.

In another example, Abhay v. Bhavik, the defendant, Mr. Bhavik, offered to sell some goods to the plaintiff, Mr. Abhay, for a certain price. The offer was accepted by Mr. Abhay, and a contract was formed. However, after a few days, the defendant revoked his offer, which was seen as a breach of contract. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and ordered the defendant to pay the agreed price for the goods.

Offer and acceptance is also seen in auctions. For example, in the case of Lord v. Post, an auction was held in April for the sale of some wool. At the auction, the plaintiff, Mr. Post, made the highest bid and was accepted by the auctioneer. This was seen as an offer and acceptance, and a legally binding contract was formed between the parties.

Finally, offer and acceptance can also take place through negotiations. In the case of Byrne v. September, the parties were involved in negotiations to purchase a horse. The offeror, Mr. Byrne, made an offer to the defendant, Mr. September, which was accepted. As a result, a contract was formed, and the parties were bound by its terms.

In conclusion, offer and acceptance is a key principle of contract law, and is seen in a variety of scenarios, from auctions to negotiations. In each case, an offer must be made, accepted, and communicated to the other party in order for a contract to be legally binding.

Overview of Contract Law in Utah

Contract law in Utah is governed by both state statutes and common law. Utah is a state that follows the “objective theory of contracts,” which holds that the parties to a contract must act in good faith and that the courts should interpret the contract according to the objective meaning of the language used, rather than the subjective intent of the parties. The Utah Code defines a contract as “an agreement between two or more persons to do or not to do a particular thing,” and states that “all contracts made in the state of Utah must be in writing, and if not in writing, must be proven by the testimony of two or more credible witnesses.”

Role of an Offer and Acceptance in Contract Formation

An offer and acceptance is a key element of contract law in Utah, as it is the process by which a contract is formed. An offer is a proposal made by one party to another, and an acceptance is the other party’s agreement to the proposal. The offer must be clear and definite and must be communicated to the other party. The acceptance must also be communicated to the other party and must be unconditional. Once an offer is accepted, the parties are legally bound by the terms of the contract.

Legal Definition of Offer

An Offer is a manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it. Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019).

Legal Definition of Acceptance

An Acceptance is defined as: n. 1. the voluntary act of receiving something that is offered, with the understanding that the thing received will become the property of the acceptor and the act will create a binding contract. 2. in the law of contracts, the act of a party who knows of an offer made by another and agrees to all the terms. 3. in the law of evidence, the act of receiving or taking something into one’s possession, with the intent to control it, to the exclusion of all others.

Elements of a Valid Offer and Acceptance

In order for an offer and acceptance to be valid, there must be certain elements present. These elements include an offer, an acceptance, consideration, and a meeting of the minds. The offer must be clear and definite, and must be communicated to the other party. The acceptance must be communicated to the other party and must be unconditional. Consideration is a bargained-for exchange of something of value, such as money or goods. Finally, there must be a meeting of the minds, meaning that both parties must agree to the terms of the contract.

Rules Governing Revocation and Termination of an Offer

An offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted by the other party. However, the revocation must be communicated to the other party. An offer can also be terminated if the offeror dies or becomes incapacitated, or if the offer has a time limit and the time limit has expired. An offer can also be terminated if it is rejected by the other party, or if it is rejected or counter-offered and the offeror does not accept the counter-offer.

Examples of Offer and Acceptance in Practice

Offer and acceptance is one of the oldest and most fundamental principles of contract law. It requires that two parties mutually agree to the terms of a contract before it can be formed. In recent years, this principle has been interpreted in a number of different ways by the courts in the state of Utah, making it important for all parties to understand their rights and obligations under this rule. This paper will explore the concept of offer and acceptance in the context of Utah case law and the Utah Code.

The first step in understanding offer and acceptance is to define the concept itself. According to the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, an offer is “the manifestation of a willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.” An offer can be expressed in words, by conduct, or even in writing. The offer should be sufficiently definite to identify the parties, the subject matter, and the terms of the agreement.

Once an offer has been made, the offeror must then wait for a response from the offeree. The offeree can either accept or reject the offer. If the offeree accepts the offer, a contract is formed. In order to determine whether an offer has been accepted, the courts look at the objective manifestations of the parties’ intent.

Binding Contract

Contract law is a body of law that governs the formation and enforcement of agreements between citizens, businesses, and other entities. It is based on a series of doctrines, principles, and rules, and is used to settle disputes in the event of a disagreement over terms, conditions, and other aspects of a contract. Negotiations are a major part of the contract formation process, in which the parties involved agree to the various terms, conditions, and prices of the contract. Offer and acceptance is the basis of contract formation, in which the offeror proposes a contract that the offeree may accept, reject, or make a counter-offer. The doctrine of revocation allows the offeror to revoke their offer before acceptance, but once accepted, the offer is generally considered to be binding.

Doctrine of Consideration

The doctrine of consideration is also important in contract formation, as it ensures that both parties contribute something of value to the contract. This could be money, goods, services, or even a promise to do something. Price is also an important factor in contract formation, as it must be agreed upon by both parties before the contract can be formed. In some cases, the parties may enter into a battle of the forms, in which each party submits their own version of the contract and works to negotiate the differences.

Doctrine of Invitation

The doctrine of invitation to treat is another important concept in contract formation. This refers to the offeror’s invitation to the offeree to enter into negotiations and consider the offer. This could be in the form of an auction, where an auctioneer invites bidders to participate, or an advertisement, where an offer is made to the public. The Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd is an example of a case in which an invitation to treat was found to be binding.

In addition to the doctrine of invitation to treat, there are other specific principles of contract law. For example, the Unidroit Principles of European Contract Law and the Carlill case established the concept of a unilateral contract, in which a party makes an offer that does not require an acceptance. The case also established the concept of a binding contract, in which acceptance of an offer creates a legal obligation for both parties to fulfill their respective obligations.

Contract Disputes

When a dispute arises regarding a contract, both parties may turn to an arbiter or mediator to help resolve the issue. The important word is may – unless the contract provides otherwise, you might not have to use a arbitrator or a mediator, you can go straight to court; however, you may want to speak with a contract lawyer in your jurisdiction before you proceed to arbitration or mediation. With that being said, an arbiter or mediator is a neutral third party who listens to both sides of the dispute and helps them to reach a resolution. Once a resolution is reached, the parties are said to have contracted, and the contract is binding.

As seen here, contract law is an important part of our legal system, and it is essential to understand the various doctrines, principles, and rules that govern contract formation. Negotiations, offer and acceptance, consideration, revocation, and the doctrine of invitation to treat are all important concepts in contract formation, and they can help parties to reach a binding contract. In the event of a dispute, an arbiter or mediator can help to resolve the issue and ensure that the parties remain contracted.

Case Law

In the case of G.E.E. Corp. v. Aragon, the Utah Supreme Court found that an offer was accepted when the offeree responded to the offeror’s request for a price quote with a written quotation. The court found that the offeree’s response was a “manifestation of assent” to the offer and, therefore, constituted an acceptance of the offer. This case demonstrates that the courts will look to the objective manifestations of the parties’ intent in determining whether an offer has been accepted.

In addition to looking to the objective manifestations of the parties’ intent, the courts in Utah have also looked to the Utah Code in determining whether an offer has been accepted. Under the Utah Code, a contract is formed when “an offer is accepted by the offeree in the manner prescribed by the offeror.” This means that if the offeror specifies how the offer is to be accepted, the offeree must accept the offer in that manner in order for a contract to be formed.

For example, in the case of Peterson v. Jones, the Utah Supreme Court found that an offer had not been accepted when the offeree responded to the offeror’s request for a price quote with an oral agreement. The court found that the offeror had specified that the offer must be accepted in writing, and since the offeree had not accepted the offer in that manner, the offer was not accepted and a contract was not formed.

Real Estate Contracts

The concept of offer and acceptance is also relevant to the formation of real estate contracts in Utah. Under the Utah Code, an agreement to purchase real estate is not valid until the buyer has accepted the seller’s offer and the seller has accepted the buyer’s offer. The acceptance must be in writing and must be signed by both parties. In addition, the acceptance must be delivered to the other party either in person or by certified mail.

Sale of Goods and Services

The concept of offer and acceptance is also relevant to the formation of contracts for the sale of goods. Under the Utah Uniform Commercial Code, a contract for the sale of goods is not valid until the buyer has accepted the seller’s offer and the seller has accepted the buyer’s offer. The acceptance must be in writing and must be signed by both parties.

Offer and acceptance is an important concept in contract law and is essential for the formation of valid contracts. In recent years, the courts in Utah have interpreted this principle in different ways, making it important for all parties to understand the rule and their rights and obligations under it. This paper has explored offer and acceptance in the context of Utah case law and the Utah Code, and has demonstrated that the courts will look to the objective manifestations of the parties’ intent and the specific requirements of the relevant statute in determining whether an offer has been accepted.

Contract Lawyer Consultation

When you need legal help from a business contract attorney, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472
https://jeremyeveland.com

What Is A Tender In Business Law?

A tender is a formal offer made by one party to another party, usually in a business setting, to purchase goods or services, or to enter into an agreement. It is usually expressed in writing, and may include an offer to purchase a certain number of goods or services at a specified price, or at a rate of exchange determined by the tenderer. The party making the offer is referred to as the tenderer, while the party receiving the offer is known as the offeree.

Black’s Legal Dictionary, 7th Edition, Abridged (2000), page 1193 states that tender is “an unconditional offer of money or performance to satisfy a debt or obligation ,a tender of delivery.. The tender may save the tendering party from a penalty for nonpayment or nonperformance of may, if the other party unjustifiably refuses the tender, place the other party in default.”

Tender is also defined as “a formal word for make or give.” according to Garner’s Dictionary of Legal Usage, Oxford University Press, Third Edition, (2011) page 881.

Tender has also been defined as “an offer to deliver something, made in pursuance of some contract or obligation, under such circumstances as to require no further act from the party making it to complete the transfer.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Volume 2, Third Revision, West Publishing (1914) page 3255. In Pennsylvania, by statue of 1705, in case of tender made before suit, the amount tendered must in the event of a suit be paid into court; Cornell v. Green, 10 S. & R. (Pa.) 14.

Tender in Business and Contract law

In business and contract law, “tender” is a term used to describe the process of offering goods, services, money, or other items of value in exchange for consideration. Tender is also used to refer to the act of submitting a formal offer to purchase an item or to accept an offer. In Utah, the tender process is governed by a combination of state and federal laws.

Tender is used in a variety of contexts, including when an individual or business offers goods or services for sale, when a purchaser submits a bid, and when a government solicits bids for a project or other services. The tender process is often used to select a contractor for large projects, such as construction of a government building, or to select a supplier for goods or services.

The tender process typically involves the submission of a tender, which is a formal offer to purchase an item or to accept an offer. The tender is typically made in the form of a bid, which is a response to a call for tenders from a buyer. The call for tenders is typically issued by the buyer, such as a government agency or business. The call for tenders typically outlines the terms of the tender, such as the price, terms of payment, and other conditions.

Tender in the US

In the United States, tender law is primarily governed by federal law. The Federal Reserve Notes, which are the legal tender of the United States, are issued by the Federal Reserve Bank in accordance with the Coinage Act of 1965. The Coinage Act of 1965 also outlines the legal tender laws of the United States, which govern the issuance of coins and notes. The Coinage Act of 1965 also outlines the legal tender laws of the United States, which govern the issuance of coins and notes.

The legal tender laws of the United States also apply to the tender process. The legal tender of the United States is defined as any notes issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, coins issued by the United States Mint, and certain other obligations issued by the United States government. The tender process generally involves the exchange of US currency for goods or services.

In Utah, tender law is also governed by state laws. For example, the Utah Business Code outlines the bidding process for government contracts, which includes the submission of a tender for the project. The Utah Business Code also outlines the requirements for submitting a formal offer to purchase goods or services, which includes the submission of a tender. The Utah Business Code also outlines the requirements for submitting a tender for a government contract, which includes the submission of a tender, a bid bond, and a performance bond.

In addition to the laws that govern the tender process, there are other considerations that must be taken into account. For example, when a business or individual submits a tender, they must provide all of the information required by the buyer in order to properly evaluate the tender. The buyer may also require the tender to be submitted in a certain form, such as a written or electronic format.

When submitting a tender, it is important to consider the legal tender of the United States and the legal tender laws of the state in which the tender is being submitted. When submitting a tender for a government contract, it is important to make sure that all of the required documents are included in the tender, such as the bid bond and performance bond. Additionally, when submitting a tender, it is important to make sure that all of the information provided is accurate and complete.

In conclusion, tender is an important process in business and contract law. Tender is used to offer goods or services in exchange for consideration. The tender process is governed by a combination of federal and state laws. When submitting a tender, it is important to consider the legal tender of the United States, the legal tender laws of the state in which the tender is being submitted, and the requirements of the buyer.

In business law, a tender is a legal instrument used to facilitate the transfer of goods and services from one party to another. It is an offer made by a party to purchase goods or services or to enter into an agreement for the sale or exchange of goods or services. The tender is generally expressed in writing and may include an offer to purchase a certain number of goods or services at a specified price or a rate of exchange. The party making the offer is referred to as the tenderer, while the party receiving the offer is known as the offeree.

Tenders are commonly used in the context of public procurement, where they are used to invite bids from potential suppliers. The tender process involves the submission of tenders by suppliers, the evaluation of those tenders by the buyer, and the award of the contract to the successful bidder.

In some cases, a tender may be used to settle a dispute between two parties. For example, if two parties are in dispute over the terms of a contract, they may enter into a “tender of performance” in which they agree to abide by the terms of the tender. In this case, the tender is used to determine the outcome of the dispute.

Buy, Sell, or Exchange

Under Utah Code § 25-1-1, a tender is defined as “a written offer, in a specified form, to buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of or receive property, or to perform a specified service, for a stated price or rate of exchange.” Additionally, Utah Code § 25-1-2 states that a tender is a “formal offer to buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of or receive property, or to perform a specified service, for a stated price or rate of exchange.”

The Utah Supreme Court has held that a tender is an offer to buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of or receive property, or to perform a specified service, for a stated price or rate of exchange. In the case of Rumbaugh v. Board of County Commissioners of Weber County, 659 P.2d 565 (Utah 1983), the court held that a tender is an offer “to purchase a defined quantity of goods, services, or property at a fixed price.” The court further held that a tender can be accepted or rejected, and that it must be made in writing.

Formal Offer

Essentially, a tender is a formal offer made by one party to another party, usually in a business setting, to purchase goods or services, or to enter into an agreement. It is usually expressed in writing, and may include an offer to purchase a certain number of goods or services at a specified price, or at a rate of exchange determined by the tenderer. Under Utah law, a tender is defined as an offer to buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of or receive property, or to perform a specified service, for a stated price or rate of exchange. The Utah Supreme Court has held that a tender is an offer to buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of or receive property, or to perform a specified service, for a stated price or rate of exchange. A tender can be accepted or rejected, and it must be made in writing.

Utah Business Lawyer Free Consultation

When you need a Utah business attorney, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472
https://jeremyeveland.com

Areas We Serve

We serve businesses and business owners for succession planning in the following locations:

Business Succession Lawyer Salt Lake City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah

Business Succession Lawyer St. George Utah

Business Succession Lawyer West Valley City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Provo Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Sandy Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah

Tender offer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In corporate finance, a tender offer is a type of public takeover bid. The tender offer is a public, open offer or invitation (usually announced in a newspaper advertisement) by a prospective acquirer to all stockholders of a publicly traded corporation (the target corporation) to tender their stock for sale at a specified price during a specified time, subject to the tendering of a minimum and maximum number of shares. In a tender offer, the bidder contacts shareholders directly; the directors of the company may or may not have endorsed the tender offer proposal.

To induce the shareholders of the target company to sell, the acquirer’s offer price is usually at a premium over the current market price of the target company’s shares. For example, if a target corporation’s stock were trading at $10 per share, an acquirer might offer $11.50 per share to shareholders on the condition that 51% of shareholders agree. Cash or securities may be offered to the target company’s shareholders, although a tender offer in which securities are offered as consideration is generally referred to as an “exchange offer“.

Governing law[edit]

United States[edit]

General[edit]

In the United States of America, tender offers are regulated by the Williams Act. SEC Regulation 14E also governs tender offers. It covers such matters as:

the minimum length of time a tender offer must remain open
procedures for modifying a tender offer after it has been issued
insider trading in the context of tender offers
whether one class of shareholders can receive preferential treatment over another

Required disclosures[edit]

In the United States, under the Williams Act, codified in Section 13(d) and Section 14(d)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a bidder must file Schedule TO with the SEC upon commencement of the tender offer. Among the matters required to be disclosed in schedule TO are: (i) a term sheet which summarizes the material terms of the tender offer in plain English; (ii) the bidder’s identity and background; and (iii) the bidder’s history with the target company. In addition, a potential acquirer must file Schedule 13D within 10 days of acquiring more than 5% of the shares of another company.

Tax consequence[edit]

The consummation of a tender offer resulting in payment to the shareholder is a taxable event triggering capital gains or losses, which may be long-term or short-term depending on the shareholder’s holding period.

Jeremy Eveland

(801) 613-1472

Tag Archives: bid

Construction Law

Construction Law

Legislative Framework

Roles of Lawyers, Contractors, and Other Stakeholders

Legal Issues in Construction Projects

Utah Construction Lien Law

Resources for Construction Lawyers

Construction Law Attorney Consultation

Recent Posts

Offer and Acceptance

Offer and Acceptance