Tag Archives: partnership agreement

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah, business, law, orem, lawyers, estate, lawyer, attorney, succession, firm, partnership, planning, agreement, george, county, attorneys, state, clients, partners, plan, parties, services, llc, mediation, litigation, tax, consultation, process, case, park, family, mediator, partner, city, probate, businesses, issues, office, st., areas, bus, utah county, law firm, free consultation, partnership agreement, legal services, business partnership agreement, ascent law llc, estate administration lawyers, succession plan, estate planning, eveland bus stop, bus stop, st. george, ethical standards, business law, legal advice, business litigation, business lawyers, saint george, effective mediator, gravis law, business owners, estate planning lawyers, legal solutions, business partnership, state street, free help, business succession plan, utah business succession, business succession lawyer, lawyer, attorney, partnership, orem, ut, mediation, clients, orem, law firm, tax, business partnership, bus, provo, probate, litigation, llc, utah, saint george, utah, legal services, liability, law, usa, ownership, utah, law firm, stakes, great basin, cpas, mediators, interstate 15, utah, utah, united states, stock, legal services, dixie, settlement, ownership interest, ownership, orem, orem city, wasatch, life insurance, consensus, insurance, general partners, business partnership, mojave desert

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah

Hiring Attorney Jeremy Eveland to draft a business succession plan in Orem, Utah is a wise decision for anyone looking for experienced legal counsel. With many years of experience in business law, Jeremy is well-versed in the nuances of business succession planning and has a deep understanding of the legal process. He works diligently with clients to ensure they understand their options and can make informed decisions. Jeremy has extensive experience in the Orem area and is a member of the Utah State Bar.

This article is part of business succession law, which is a subsection of business law.

When business disputes happen, he is an effective working with the mediator, and assisting parties to come to an agreement that meets their mutual needs. He is also a skilled litigator, having handled a variety of business cases in his career. He is committed to providing ethical and legal advice to the clients he serves.

Orem Utah Business Lawyer

For those looking for probate, estate planning, or estate administration lawyers, Jeremy is a solid choice. He is knowledgeable in the areas of estate planning, probate, and liability, and is experienced in creating partnership agreements, buy-sell agreements, and other documents related to business succession planning. He is well-versed in the tax implications of estate planning and can provide advice on how to minimize taxes and maximize estate value.

Business Formation Attorney Orem UT

Jeremy is also well-versed in the process of creating LLCs and other business entities. He can help clients draft the necessary paperwork, such as partnership agreements and operating agreements, to ensure the business is properly formed and all parties involved are properly protected. He can also provide legal advice on the ownership stakes of each business partner and the ownership interests of each party.

Jeremy is committed to providing the best legal services and solutions to his clients. He offers free consultations and is available to answer any questions clients might have. He is also available to discuss mediation, if necessary, to reach a settlement agreement between parties.

Utah Business Entity

When we talk about business entities, we are referring to the type or structure of a business as opposed to what the business does. How a business is structured affects how taxes are paid, liabilities are determined, and of course, paperwork. Business entities—organizations created by one or more people to carry on a trade—are usually created at the state level, often by filing documents with a state agency such as the Secretary of State.

Business entities are subject to taxation and must file a tax return.

For federal income tax purposes, some business entities are, by default, considered not to be separate from their owner. Such is the case with sole proprietors and single-member limited liability companies. The income and deductions related to these entities are normally reported on the same tax return as the owner of the business. The IRS calls these disregarded entities because it “disregards” the separate name and structure of the business. However, a disregarded entity can choose to be treated as if it were a separate entity. This is done by making an Entity Classification Election using Form 8832 and filing this form with the IRS. The purpose of this form is to choose a classification other than the default classification provided by federal tax laws.

Confusion Over Business and tax Terms

Distinguishing between the actual organizational structure created under state law and the tax classification can cause confusion, especially if the same words are used for both concepts. Colloquially, when accountants talk about “entities” or “entity returns,” they are referring to tax returns other than for individual people.
In simplest terms, a business entity is an organization created by an individual or individuals to conduct business, engage in a trade, or partake in similar activities. There are various types of business entities—sole proprietorship, partnership, LLC, corporation, etc.—and a business’s entity type dictates both the structure of that organization and how that company is taxed.

When starting a business, one of the first things you want to do is choose the structure of your company—in other words, choose a business entity type. This decision will have important legal and financial implications for your business. The amount of taxes you have to pay depends on your business entity choice, as does the ease with which you can get a small business loan or raise money from investors. Plus, if someone sues your business, your business entity structure determines your risk exposure. State governments in the U.S. recognize more than a dozen different types of business entities, but the average small business owner chooses between these six: sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership (LP), limited liability company (LLC), C-corporation, and S-corporation.

Business Succession Lawyer Free Consultation

When you need a business succession attorney, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472.

Areas We Serve

We serve businesses and business owners for succession planning in the following locations:

Business Succession Lawyer Salt Lake City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah

Business Succession Lawyer St. George Utah

Business Succession Lawyer West Valley City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Provo Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Sandy Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Orem Utah

Types of Business Entities in Utah

As we mentioned above, at a very basic level, a business entity simply means an organization that has been formed to conduct business. However, the type of entity you choose for your business determines how your company is structured and taxed. For example, by definition, a sole proprietorship must be owned and operated by a single owner. If your business entity type is a partnership, on the other hand, this means there are two or more owners. Similarly, if you establish a business as a sole proprietorship, this means for tax purposes, you’re a pass-through entity (the taxes are passed onto the business owner). Conversely, if you establish your business as a corporation, this means the business exists separately from its owners, and therefore, pays separate taxes. Generally, to actually establish your business’s entity structure, you’ll register in the state where your business is located. With all of this in mind, the chart below summarizes the various entity types business owners can choose from:

Business Entity Type

• Sole proprietorship: Unincorporated business with one owner or jointly owned by a married couple
• General partnership: Unincorporated business with two or more owners
• Limited partnership: Registered business composed of active, general partners and passive, limited partners
• Limited liability partnership: Partnership structure that shields all partners from personal liability
• Limited liability limited partnership: Type of limited partnership with some liability protection for general partners
• Limited liability company (LLC): Registered business with limited liability for all members
• Professional limited liability company: LLC structure for professionals, such as doctors and accountants
• C-corporation: Incorporated business composed of shareholders, directors, and officers
• S-corporation: Incorporated business that is taxed as a pass-through entity
• Professional corporation: Corporate structure for professionals, such as doctors and accountants
• B-corporation: For-profit corporation that is certified for meeting social and environmental standards
• Nonprofit: Corporation formed primarily to benefit the public interest rather than earn a profit
• Estate: Separate legal entity created to distribute an individual’s property after death
• Municipality: Corporate status given to a city or town
• Cooperative: Private organization owned and controlled by a group of individuals for their own benefit

As you can see, there are numerous types of business entities; however, most business owners will choose from the six most common options: sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership, LLC, C-corporation, or S-corporation. Below, we’ve explained each of these popular business entity types, as well as the pros and cons of choosing each particular structure for your company.

Sole Proprietorship

A sole proprietorship is the simplest business entity, with one person (or a married couple) as the sole owner and operator of the business. If you launch a new business and are the only owner, you are automatically a sole proprietorship under the law. There’s no need to register a sole proprietorship with the state, though you might need local business licenses or permits depending on your industry. Freelancers, consultants, and other service professionals commonly work as sole proprietors, but it’s also a viable option for more established businesses, such as retail stores, with one person at the helm.

Pros of Sole Proprietorship

• Easy to start (no need to register your business with the state).
• No corporate formalities or paperwork requirements, such as meeting minutes, bylaws, etc.
• You can deduct most business losses on your personal tax return.
• Tax filings is easy—simply fill out and attach Schedule C-Profit or Loss From Business to your personal income tax return.

Cons of Sole Proprietorship

• As the only owner, you’re personally responsible for all of the business’s debts and liabilities—someone who wins a lawsuit against your business can take your personal assets (your car, personal bank accounts, even your home in some situations).
• There’s no real separation between you and the business, so it’s more difficult to get a business loan and raise money (lenders and investors prefer LLCs or corporations).
• It’s harder to build business credit without a registered business entity.
Sole proprietorships are by far the most popular type of business structure in the U.S. because of how easy they are to set up. There’s a lot of overlap between your personal and business finances, which makes it easy to launch and file taxes. The problem is that this same lack of separation can also land you in legal trouble. If a customer, employee, or another third party successfully sues your business, they can take your personal assets. Due to this risk, most sole proprietors eventually convert their business to an LLC or corporation.

General Partnership (GP)

Partnerships share many similarities with sole proprietorships—the key difference is that the business has two or more owners. There are two kinds of partnerships: general partnerships (GPs) and limited partnerships (LPs). In a general partnership, all partners actively manage the business and share in the profits and losses. Like a sole proprietorship, a general partnership is the default mode of ownership for multiple-owner businesses—there’s no need to register a general partnership with the state. I’ve written about the Utah Uniform Partnership Act previously.

Pros of General Partnership

• Easy to start (no need to register your business with the state).
• No corporate formalities or paperwork requirements, such as meeting minutes, bylaws, etc.
• You don’t need to absorb all the business losses on your own because the partners divide the profits and losses.
• Owners can deduct most business losses on their personal tax returns.

Cons of General Partnership

• Each owner is personally liable for the business’s debts and other liabilities.
• In some states, each partner may be personally liable for another partner’s negligent actions or behavior (this is called joint and several liability).
• Disputes among partners can unravel the business (though drafting a solid partnership agreement can help you avoid this).
• It’s more difficult to get a business loan, land a big client, and build business credit without a registered business entity.

Most people form partnerships to lower the risk of starting a business. Instead of going all-in on your own, having multiple people sharing the struggles and successes can be very helpful, especially in the early years. This being said, if you do go this route, it’s very important to choose the right partner or partners. Disputes can seriously limit a business’s growth, and many state laws hold each partner fully responsible for the actions of the others. For example, if one partner enters into a contract and then violates one of the terms, the third party can personally sue any or all of the partners.

Limited Partnership (LP)

Unlike a general partnership, a limited partnership is a registered business entity. To form an LP, therefore, you must file paperwork with the state. In an LP, there are two kinds of partners: those who own, operate, and assume liability for the business (general partners), and those who act only as investors (limited partners, sometimes called “silent partners”). Limited partners don’t have control over business operations and have fewer liabilities. They typically act as investors in the business and also pay fewer taxes because they have a more tangential role in the company.

Pros of Limited Partnership

• An LP is a good option for raising money because investors can serve as limited partners without personal liability.
• General partners get the money they need to operate but maintain authority over business operations.
• Limited partners can leave anytime without dissolving the business partnership.

Cons of Limited Partnership

• General partners are personally responsible for the business’s debts and liabilities.
• More expensive to create than a general partnership and requires a state filing.
• A limited partner may also face personal liability if they inadvertently take too active a role in the business.

Multi-owner businesses that want to raise money from investors often do well as LPs because investors can avoid liability. You might come across yet another business entity structure called a limited liability partnership (LLP). In an LLP, none of the partners have personal liability for the business, but most states only allow law firms, accounting firms, doctor’s offices, and other professional service firms to organize as LLPs. These types of businesses can organize as an LLP to avoid each partner being liable for the other’s actions. For example, if one doctor in a medical practice commits malpractice, having an LLP lets the other doctors avoid liability.

C-Corporation

A C-corporation is an independent legal entity that exists separately from the company’s owners. Shareholders (the owners), a board of directors, and officers have control over the corporation, although one person in a C-corp can fulfill all of these roles, so it is possible to create a corporation where you’re in charge of everything. This being said, with this type of business entity, there are many more regulations and tax laws that the company must comply with. Methods for incorporating, fees, and required forms vary by state.

Pros of C-corporation

• Owners (shareholders) don’t have personal liability for the business’s debts and liabilities.
• C-corporations are eligible for more tax deductions than any other type of business.
• C-corporation owners pay lower self-employment taxes.
• You have the ability to offer stock options, which can help you raise money in the future.

Cons of C-corporation

• More expensive to create than sole proprietorships and partnerships (the filing fees required to incorporate a business range from $100 to $500 based on which state you’re in).
• C-corporations face double taxation: The company pays taxes on the corporate tax return, and then shareholders pay taxes on dividends on their personal tax returns.
• Owners cannot deduct business losses on their personal tax returns.
• There are a lot of formalities that corporations have to meet, such as holding board and shareholder meetings, keeping meeting minutes, and creating bylaws.
Most small businesses pass over C-corps when deciding how to structure their business, but they can be a good choice as your business grows and you find yourself needing more legal protections. The biggest benefit of a C-corp is limited liability. If someone sues the business, they are limited to taking business assets to cover the judgment—they can’t come after your home, car, or other personal assets. This being said, corporations are a mixed bag from a tax perspective—there are more tax deductions and fewer self-employment taxes, but there’s the possibility of double taxation if you plan to offer dividends. Owners who invest profits back into the business as opposed to taking dividends are more likely to benefit under a corporate structure.

S-Corporation

An S-corporation preserves the limited liability that comes with a C-corporation but is a pass-through entity for tax purposes. This means that, similar to a sole prop or partnership, an S-corp’s profits and losses pass through to the owners’ personal tax returns. There’s no corporate-level taxation for an S-corp.

Pros of S-corporation

• Owners (shareholders) don’t have personal liability for the business’s debts and liabilities.
• No corporate taxation and no double taxation: An S-corp is a pass-through entity, so the government taxes it much like a sole proprietorship or partnership.

Cons of S-corporation

• Like C-corporations, S-corporations are more expensive to create than both sole proprietorships and partnerships (requires registration with the state).
• There are more limits on issuing stock with S-corps vs. C-corps.
• You still need to comply with corporate formalities, like creating bylaws and holding board and shareholder meetings.
In order to organize as an S-corporation or convert your business to an S-corporation, you have to file IRS form 2553. S-corporations can be a good choice for businesses that want a corporate structure but like the tax flexibility of a sole proprietorship or partnership.

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

A limited liability company takes positive features from each of the other business entity types. Like corporations, LLCs offer limited liability protections. But, LLCs also have less paperwork and ongoing requirements, and in that sense, they are more like sole proprietorships and partnerships. Another big benefit is that you can choose how you want the IRS to tax your LLC. You can elect to have the IRS treat it as a corporation or as a pass-through entity on your taxes.

Pros of LLC

• Owners don’t have personal liability for the business’s debts or liabilities.
• You can choose whether you want your LLC to be taxed as a partnership or as a corporation.
• Not as many corporate formalities compared to an S-corp or C-corp.

Cons of LLC

• It’s more expensive to create an LLC than a sole proprietorship or partnership (requires registration with the state).
LLCs are popular among small business owners, including freelancers, because they combine the best of many worlds: the ease of a sole proprietorship or partnership with the legal protections of a corporation.

At the end of the day, hiring Attorney Jeremy Eveland to draft a business succession plan in Orem, Utah is a wise decision. With his extensive experience, knowledge, and commitment to providing the best legal solutions, clients can be assured that their business succession plan will be drafted with the utmost care and consideration. Jeremy is committed to providing the best legal advice and is available to answer any questions or concerns clients may have. With Jeremy’s help, clients can feel confident in their business succession plan and the future of their business.

Orem, Utah

 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
Orem, Utah
Orem City Center

Orem City Center
Flag of Orem, Utah

Nickname: 

Family City USA
Location in Utah County and the state of Utah

Location in Utah County and the state of Utah
Coordinates: 40°17′56″N 111°41′47″WCoordinates40°17′56″N 111°41′47″W
Country United States
State Utah
County Utah
Settled 1877
Town charter granted May 5, 1919
Named for Walter C. Orem
Government

 
 • Mayor David Young
 • Spokesman Steven Downs
 • City Manager James P. Davidson[2]
Area

 
 • Total 18.57 sq mi (48.10 km2)
 • Land 18.57 sq mi (48.10 km2)
 • Water 0.00 sq mi (0.00 km2)
Elevation

 
4,774 ft (1,455 m)
Population

 (2020)
 • Total 98,129[1]
 • Density 5,267.22/sq mi (2,033.67/km2)
Time zone UTC-7 (Mountain (MST))
 • Summer (DST) UTC-6 (MDT)
Area codes 385, 801
FIPS code 49-57300[3]
GNIS feature ID 1444110[4]
Website www.orem.org]

Orem is a city in Utah CountyUtah, United States, in the northern part of the state. It is adjacent to ProvoLindon, and Vineyard and is approximately 45 miles (72 km) south of Salt Lake City.

Orem is one of the principal cities of the Provo-Orem, Utah Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes all of Utah and Juab counties. The 2020 population was 98,129,[1] while the 2010 population was 88,328[5] making it the fifth-largest city in UtahUtah Valley University is located in Orem.

Orem, Utah

About Orem, Utah

Orem is a city in Utah County, Utah, United States, in the northern part of the state. It is adjacent to Provo, Lindon, and Vineyard and is approximately 45 miles (72 km) south of Salt Lake City.

Bus Stops in Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Orem Central Station (Bay E) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Orem / Provo, UT Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Orem McDonalds Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in State St @ 418 N Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Orem Central Station (Bay A) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in State St @ 763 N Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Center St / Orem Blvd (WB) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in Center St / 600 W (EB) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in UVU Station (adjacent bus stop EB) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in State St @ 1951 N Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in State St @ 101 S Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Bus Stop in UVU Institute (EB) Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Map of Orem, Utah

Driving Directions in Orem, Utah to Jeremy Eveland

Driving Directions from Dexter & Dexter Attorneys at Law to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Siegfried & Jensen to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Lincoln Law to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Keen Law Offices, LLC to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Johnstun Law to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Good Guys Injury Law - Christensen & Hymas to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Heritage Law Offices to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Weekes Law to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Johnson | Livingston, PLLC to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Utah Eviction Law to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Veil to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Driving Directions from Gutierrez & Assoc. PLLC to 17 N State St, Lindon, UT 84042, USA

Reviews for Jeremy Eveland Orem, Utah

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act (UPA) is a set of laws that govern the formation and operation of partnerships in the state of Utah. The UPA is based upon the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA) of 1914, which was developed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. The UPA was adopted in Utah in 1936 and has been amended several times since then.

The UPA is designed to provide a framework that governs the rights and obligations of the partners in a partnership. It also outlines the general management and administrative responsibilities of the partners and their respective rights and duties.

The UPA provides a comprehensive set of rules that govern the formation, operation, and dissolution of partnerships. It outlines the rights of each partner in the partnership, as well as the duties of each partner to the partnership. The UPA also sets forth the procedure for resolving disputes among the partners.

The UPA contains a number of different provisions that are designed to protect the interests of the partners in a partnership. For example, the UPA outlines the fiduciary duties of the partners, which require them to act in the best interests of the partnership. The UPA also outlines the legal responsibilities of the partners, which require them to act in accordance with the partnership agreement.

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act, remedies, great salt lake city, uniform law commissioners, constructive trust, llps, i-80, revised uniform partnership act, salt lake, succession-planning, national conference of commissioners on uniform state laws, bench strength, remedy, retention, liable, partnership, trust, general partner, westlaw, liability, personal liability, limited partnership, fiduciary duties, utah, succession planning, leadership, uniform partnership act, citation, salt lake city, bedding, limited liability partnership, rupa, employees, clothing, upholstered furniture, furniture, llp, city, partnership, salt, lake, talent management, limited partnership, lawyer, limited liability, uniform partnership act, partnership agreement, general session, limited liability partnership, succession planning, liability partnership, limited liability, utah code page, transferable interest, lake city, partnership property, interest exchange, subsequent law, partnership act, limited partnership, upholstered furniture, general partners, fiduciary duties, business exit planning, united states, real property, partnership authority, national conference, uniform state laws, partnership assets, ordinary course, utah code, general session utah, code page, general session part, partnership, partner, person, business, act, chapter, liability, partners, succession, law, subsection, record, state, division, property, agreement, interest, statement, section, planning, code, session, authority, entity, part, process, activities, order, management, time, rights, name, leadership, practice, affairs, partnerships, city, title, distribution, obligation

The UPA also addresses issues such as the transfer of ownership of the partnership assets, the distribution of profits and losses, the dispersal of partnership property upon dissolution, and the enforceability of the partnership agreement.

The UPA provides a number of remedies for breach of partnership rights. If one partner fails to comply with the terms of the partnership agreement, the other partners may seek compensation for any losses resulting from the breach. Additionally, if one partner fails to comply with the fiduciary duties of the partnership, the other partners may seek damages for any losses resulting from the breach.

The UPA also provides a number of other remedies for breach of partnership rights. For example, if one partner breaches the partnership agreement, the other partners may seek an equitable remedy, such as an injunction or a constructive trust. Additionally, if one partner fails to comply with their fiduciary duties, the other partners may seek equitable remedies such as an accounting or a constructive trust.

The UPA also provides a number of remedies for the enforcement of partnership rights. If one partner breaches the terms of the partnership agreement, the other partners may seek an injunction to prevent the breach from occurring. Additionally, if one partner breaches their fiduciary duties, the other partners may seek an injunction to prevent the breach from occurring.

The UPA is an important set of laws that provide the framework for the formation and operation of partnerships in the state of Utah. The UPA outlines the rights and obligations of the partners in a partnership, as well as the general management and administrative responsibilities of the partners. The UPA also provides a number of remedies for breach of partnership rights and for the enforcement of partnership rights.

Utah Partnership Lawyer Free Consultation

Call attorney Jeremy Eveland for a free partnership law consultation in Utah today (801) 613-1472. We look forward to serving you.

Related Posts

Business Succession Lawyer Salt Lake City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer West Valley City Utah

Business Succession Lawyer Provo Utah

The 10 Essential Elements of Business Succession Planning

Business Succession Lawyer West Jordan Utah

Business Succession Lawyer St. George Utah

Business Succession Law

Business Succession Lawyer Sandy Utah

Salt Lake City

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
 
Salt Lake City, Utah
City of Salt Lake City[1]
Clockwise from top: The skyline in July 2011, Utah State Capitol, TRAX, Union Pacific Depot, the Block U, the City-County Building, and the Salt Lake Temple

Clockwise from top: The skyline in July 2011, Utah State CapitolTRAXUnion Pacific Depot, the Block U, the City-County Building, and the Salt Lake Temple
Nickname: 

“The Crossroads of the West”

 
Interactive map of Salt Lake City
Coordinates: 40°45′39″N 111°53′28″WCoordinates40°45′39″N 111°53′28″W
Country United States United States
State Utah
County Salt Lake
Platted 1857; 165 years ago[2]
Named for Great Salt Lake
Government

 
 • Type Strong Mayor–council
 • Mayor Erin Mendenhall (D)
Area

 • City 110.81 sq mi (286.99 km2)
 • Land 110.34 sq mi (285.77 km2)
 • Water 0.47 sq mi (1.22 km2)
Elevation

 
4,327 ft (1,288 m)
Population

 • City 200,133
 • Rank 122nd in the United States
1st in Utah
 • Density 1,797.52/sq mi (701.84/km2)
 • Urban

 
1,021,243 (US: 42nd)
 • Metro

 
1,257,936 (US: 47th)
 • CSA

 
2,606,548 (US: 22nd)
Demonym Salt Laker[5]
Time zone UTC−7 (Mountain)
 • Summer (DST) UTC−6
ZIP Codes
show

ZIP Codes[6]
Area codes 801, 385
FIPS code 49-67000[7]
GNIS feature ID 1454997[8]
Major airport Salt Lake City International Airport
Website Salt Lake City Government

Salt Lake City (often shortened to Salt Lake and abbreviated as SLC) is the capital and most populous city of Utah, as well as the seat of Salt Lake County, the most populous county in Utah. With a population of 200,133 in 2020,[10] the city is the core of the Salt Lake City metropolitan area, which had a population of 1,257,936 at the 2020 census. Salt Lake City is further situated within a larger metropolis known as the Salt Lake City–Ogden–Provo Combined Statistical Area, a corridor of contiguous urban and suburban development stretched along a 120-mile (190 km) segment of the Wasatch Front, comprising a population of 2,606,548 (as of 2018 estimates),[11] making it the 22nd largest in the nation. It is also the central core of the larger of only two major urban areas located within the Great Basin (the other being Reno, Nevada).

Salt Lake City was founded July 24, 1847, by early pioneer settlers, led by Brigham Young, who were seeking to escape persecution they had experienced while living farther east. The Mormon pioneers, as they would come to be known, entered a semi-arid valley and immediately began planning and building an extensive irrigation network which could feed the population and foster future growth. Salt Lake City’s street grid system is based on a standard compass grid plan, with the southeast corner of Temple Square (the area containing the Salt Lake Temple in downtown Salt Lake City) serving as the origin of the Salt Lake meridian. Owing to its proximity to the Great Salt Lake, the city was originally named Great Salt Lake City. In 1868, the word “Great” was dropped from the city’s name.[12]

Immigration of international members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saintsmining booms, and the construction of the first transcontinental railroad initially brought economic growth, and the city was nicknamed “The Crossroads of the West”. It was traversed by the Lincoln Highway, the first transcontinental highway, in 1913. Two major cross-country freeways, I-15 and I-80, now intersect in the city. The city also has a belt route, I-215.

Salt Lake City has developed a strong tourist industry based primarily on skiing and outdoor recreation. It hosted the 2002 Winter Olympics. It is known for its politically progressive and diverse culture, which stands at contrast with the rest of the state’s conservative leanings.[13] It is home to a significant LGBT community and hosts the annual Utah Pride Festival.[14] It is the industrial banking center of the United States.[15] Salt Lake City and the surrounding area are also the location of several institutions of higher education including the state’s flagship research school, the University of Utah. Sustained drought in Utah has more recently strained Salt Lake City’s water security and caused the Great Salt Lake level drop to record low levels,[16][17] and impacting the state’s economy, of which the Wasatch Front area anchored by Salt Lake City constitutes 80%.[18]

No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...
No data matched by id...

Succession Planning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Business succession planning[edit]

Effective succession or talent-pool management concerns itself with building a series of feeder groups up and down the entire leadership pipeline or progression.[6] In contrast, replacement planning is focused narrowly on identifying specific back-up candidates for given senior management positions. Thought should be given to the retention of key employees, and the consequences that the departure of key employees may have on the business.[7]

Fundamental to the succession-management process is an underlying philosophy that argues that top talent in the corporation must be managed for the greater good of the enterprise. Merck and other companies argue that a “talent mindset” must be part of the leadership culture for these practices to be effective.[8]

Organizations use succession planning as a process to ensure that employees are recruited and developed to fill each key role within the company. Through one’s succession-planning process, one recruits superior employees,[citation needed] develops their knowledge, skills, and abilities, and prepares them for advancement or promotion into ever more-challenging roles. Actively pursuing succession planning ensures that employees are constantly developed to fill each needed role. As one’s organization expands, loses key employees, provides promotional opportunities, or increases sales, one’s succession planning aims to ensure that one has employees on hand ready and waiting to fill new roles. Succession planning is one of important processes in leadership pipeline.

According to a 2006 Canadian Federation of Independent Business survey,[9] slightly more than one third of owners of independent businesses plan to exit their business within the next 5 years – and within the next 10 years two-thirds of owners plan to exit their business. The survey also found that Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are not adequately prepared for their business succession: only 10% of owners have a formal, written succession plan; 38% have an informal, unwritten plan; and the remaining 52% do not have any succession plan at all. A 2004 CIBC survey suggests that succession planning is increasingly becoming a critical issue. The CIBC estimated that by 2010, $1.2 trillion in business assets would be poised to change hands.[10]

Research indicates many succession-planning initiatives fall short of their intent.[11] “Bench strength”, as it is commonly called, remains a stubborn problem in many if not most companies. Studies indicate that companies that report the greatest gains from succession planning feature high ownership by the CEO and high degrees of engagement among the larger leadership team.[12]

Companies well known for their succession planning and executive-talent development practices include: General ElectricHoneywellIBMMarriottMicrosoftPepsi and Procter & Gamble.

Research indicates that clear objectives are critical to establishing effective succession planning.[12] These objectives tend to be core to many or most companies that have well-established practices:

  • Identify those with the potential to assume greater responsibility in the organization
  • Provide critical development experiences to those that can move into key roles
  • Engage the leadership in supporting the development of high-potential leaders
  • Build a database that can be used to make better staffing decisions for key jobs

In other companies these additional objectives may be embedded in the succession process:

  • Improve employee commitment and retention
  • Meet the career development expectations of existing employees
  • Counter the increasing difficulty and costs of recruiting employees externally

Process and practices[edit]

Companies devise elaborate models to characterize their succession and development practices. Most reflect a cyclical series of activities that include these fundamentals:

  • Identify key roles for succession or replacement planning
  • Define the competencies and motivational profile required to undertake those roles
  • Assess people against these criteria – with a future orientation
  • Identify pools of talent that could potentially fill and perform highly in key roles
  • Develop employees to be ready for advancement into key roles – primarily through the right set of experiences.

In many companies, over the past several years,[when?] the emphasis has shifted from planning job assignments to development, with much greater focus on managing key experiences that are critical to growing global-business leaders.[citation needed] North American companies tend to be more active in this regard, followed by European and Latin American countries.

PepsiCo, IBM and Nike provide current examples of the so-called “game-planning” approach to succession and talent management. In these and other companies annual reviews are supplemented with an ongoing series of discussions among senior leaders about who is ready to assume larger roles. Vacancies are anticipated and slates of names are prepared based on highest potential and readiness for job moves. Organization realignments are viewed as critical windows-of-opportunity to utilize development moves that will serve the greater good of the enterprise.

Assessment is a key practice in effective succession-planning. There is no widely accepted formula for evaluating the future potential of leaders, but many tools and approaches continue to be used today, ranging from personality and cognitive testing to team-based interviewing and simulations and other Assessment centre methods. Elliott Jaques and others have argued for the importance of focusing assessments narrowly on critical differentiators of future performance. Jaques developed a persuasive case for measuring candidates’ ability to manage complexity, formulating a robust operational definition of business intelligence.[13] The Cognitive Process Profile (CPP) psychometric is an example of a tool used in succession planning to measure candidates’ ability to manage complexity according to Jaques’ definition.

Companies struggle to find practices that are effective and practical. It is clear that leaders who rely on instinct and gut to make promotion decisions are often not effective.[citation needed] Research indicates that the most valid practices for assessment are those that involve multiple methods and especially multiple raters.[14][need quotation to verify] “Calibration meetings” composed of senior leaders can be quite effective in judging a slate of potential senior leaders with the right tools and facilitation.[citation needed]

With organisations facing increasing complexity and uncertainty in their operating environments some[quantify] suggest a move away from competence-based approaches.[15] In a future that is increasingly hard to predict leaders will need to see opportunity in volatility, spot patterns in complexity, find creative solutions to problems, keep in mind long-term strategic goals for the organisation and wider society, and hold onto uncertainty until the optimum time to make a decision.[citation needed]

Professionals in the field, including academics, consultants and corporate practitioners, have many strongly-held views on the topic. Best practice is a slippery concept in this field. There are many thought-pieces on the subject that readers may[original research?] find valuable, such as “Debunking 10 Top Talent Management Myths”, Talent Management Magazine, Doris Sims, December 2009. Research-based writing is more difficult to find. The Corporate Leadership Council, The Best Practice Institute (BPI) and the Center for Creative Leadership, as well as the Human Resources Planning Society, are sources of some effective research-based materials.

Over the years,[when?] organizations have changed their approach to succession planning. What used to be a rigid, confidential process of hand-picking executives to be company successors is now becoming a more fluid, transparent practice that identifies high-potential leaders and incorporates development programs preparing them for top positions.[16] As of 2017 corporations consider succession planning a part of a holistic strategy called “talent management”.[citation needed] According to the company PEMCO, “talent management is defined as the activities and processes throughout the employee life cycle: recruiting and hiring, Onboarding, training, professional development, performance management, workforce planning, leadership development, career development, cross-functional work assignments, succession planning, and the employee exit process”.[16] When managing internal talent, companies must “know whether the right people, are moving at the right pace into the right jobs at the right time”.[17] An effective succession-planning strategy, coupled with solid career-development programs, will help paint a more promising future for employees.[citation needed]

Succession management[edit]

A substantial body of literature discusses succession planning. The first book that addressed the topic fully was “Executive Continuity” by Walter Mahler. Mahler was responsible in the 1970s for helping to shape the General Electric succession process which became the gold standard of corporate practice. Mahler, who was heavily influenced by Peter Drucker, wrote three other books on the subject of succession, all of which are out of print. His colleagues, Steve Drotter and Greg Kesler,[12] as well as others, expanded on Mahler’s work in their writings. “The Leadership Pipeline: How to Build the Leadership Powered Company”, by Charan, Drotter and Noel is noteworthy.[6][need quotation to verify] A new edited collection of materials, edited by Marshall Goldsmith, describes many contemporary examples in large companies.[18]

Most large corporations assign a process owner for talent and succession management. Resourcing of the work varies widely – from numbers of highly dedicated internal consultants to limited professional support embedded in the roles of human-resources generalists. Often these staff resources are separate from external staffing or recruiting functions. As of 2017 some companies seek to integrate internal and external staffing. Others are more inclined to integrate succession management with the performance management process in order simplify the work for line managers.

Succession advisors[edit]

A prior preparation needs to be done for the replacement of a CEO in family firms.[citation needed] The role of advisors is important as they help with the transition of leadership between the current-generation leaders and the successors.[citation needed] Advisors help family-owned businesses establish their own leadership skills. This process is relatively long if the successors want to be accepted by all employees. They need to take higher managing positions gradually to be respected. During this process, the successors are asked to develop different skills such as leadership. This is where the role of advisors fully exemplifies its importance. It is when the managing position is shared between the first-generation leader, the second and the advisors. An advisor helps with communication because emotional factors between family members can badly affect the company. The advisors help manage everything during a predetermined period of time and make the succession process less painful and eventful for everybody. In these cases, an interim leadership is usually what is best for the company. The employees can get accustomed to changes while getting to know the future CEO.[19][20]

Business Exit Planning[edit]

With the global proliferation of SMEs, issues of business succession and continuity have become increasingly common. When the owner of a business becomes incapacitated or passes away, it is often necessary to shut down an otherwise healthy business. Or in many instances, successors inherit a healthy business, which is forced into bankruptcy because of lack of available liquidity to pay inheritance taxes and other taxes. Proper planning helps avoid many of the problems associated with succession and transfer of ownership.

Business Exit Planning is a body of knowledge which began developing in the United States towards the end of the 20th century[citation needed], and is now spreading globally. A Business Exit Planning exercise begins with the shareholder(s) of a company defining their objectives with respect to an eventual exit, and then executing their plan, as the following definition suggests:

Business Exit Planning is the process of explicitly defining exit-related objectives for the owner(s) of a business, followed by the design of a comprehensive strategy and road map that take into account all personal, business, financial, legal, and taxation aspects of achieving those objectives, usually in the context of planning the leadership succession and continuity of a business. Objectives may include maximizing (or setting a goal for) proceeds, minimizing risk, closing a Transaction quickly, or selecting an investor that will ensure that the business prospers. The strategy should also take into account contingencies such as illness or death.[21]

All personal, financial, and business aspects should be taken into consideration. This is also a good time to plan an efficient transfer from the point of view of possibly applicable estate taxes, capital gains taxes, or other taxes.

Sale of a business is not the only form of exit. Forms of exit may also include initial public offering, management buyout, passing on the firm to next-of-kin, or even bankruptcy. Bringing on board financial strategic or financial partners may also be considered a form of exit, to the extent that it may help ensure succession and survival of the business.

In developed countries, the so-called “baby boomer” demographic wave is now reaching the stage where serious consideration needs to be given to exit. Hence, the importance of Business Exit Planning is expected to further increase in the coming years.

Family business[edit]

Small business succession tends to focus on how a business will continue to operate once its founder or initial leadership team retires or otherwise leaves the business. While small businesses on the whole often fail after the departure of their initial leadership team, succession planning can result in significantly improved chances for a business’s continuation.[22]

Within the context of succession planning, where a small business is owned by a group of managers or partners, thought should be given to the transition of the business to the partners, how departure from a business will be managed, and how shares or ownership interest will be valued for purposes of sale or buy-out.[23]

When succession occurs within a company’s hierarchy, succession plans should consider issues that may arise relating to retention of the intended successor, the possibility of jealousy by other employees, and how other employees will respond when they learn of the succession plan.[23] Additional issues are likely to arise if succession is to a family member,[24] particularly if more than one child of the managing owner works for the business or if siblings who do not work for the business will gain shares without having invested time and energy in the business.[23]

Small businesses and perhaps especially family businesses benefit from creating a disciplined succession process, involving,

  • Discussion and commitment by the shareholders;
  • Careful candidate selection; and
  • Integration and development of the selected successor.[22]

No part of the process should be rushed, with the integration process being expected to take roughly two years.[22]

Succession planning is a process and strategy for replacement planning or passing on leadership roles. It is used to identify and develop new, potential leaders who can move into leadership roles when they become vacant.[1][2] Succession planning in dictatorshipsmonarchies, politics, and international relations is used to ensure continuity and prevention of power struggle.[3][4] Within monarchies succession is settled by the order of succession.[3] In business, succession planning entails developing internal people with managing or leadership potential to fill key hierarchical positions in the company. It is a process of identifying critical roles in a company and the core skills associated with those roles, and then identifying possible internal candidates to assume those roles when they become vacant.[2] Succession planning also applies to small and family businesses (including farms and agriculture) where it is the process used to transition the ownership and management of a business to the next generation.[5]

Utah Uniform Partnership Act Lawyer Consultation

When you need legal help with the Utah Uniform Partnership Act, call Jeremy D. Eveland, MBA, JD (801) 613-1472.

Jeremy Eveland
17 North State Street
Lindon UT 84042
(801) 613-1472
https://jeremyeveland.com

Recent Posts

Business Law

Business Lawyer

Contract Law

Offer and Acceptance

The Utah Uniform Partnership Act

The 10 Essential Elements of Business Succession Planning

Business Succession Law

Estate Planning

Utah Business Law

Advertising Law

Real Estate Law

Law Firm

Legal Contract

Intellectual Property

Last Will and Testament